Heh. I hope we archive the current Angel thread in time for the lexicographers to stumble upon the Doppelkäts defense of "verbize."
Dawn: Any luck? Willow: If you define luck as the absence of success--plenty.
'Touched'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
DavidS - Feb 01, 2004 3:09:59 pm PST #6707 of 10005
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
askye - Feb 01, 2004 4:14:04 pm PST #6708 of 10005
Thrive to spite them
I voted as soon as the announcement was made in Press, am I going to have to vote again?
Elena - Feb 01, 2004 4:29:42 pm PST #6709 of 10005
Thanks for all the fish.
I think that everyone who voted before Jon posted the second notice in Press needs to vote again.
Is that right?
DXMachina - Feb 01, 2004 4:41:45 pm PST #6710 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Yes.
Betsy HP - Feb 02, 2004 8:03:15 am PST #6711 of 10005
If I only had a brain...
I think the idea was to use threads that were already archived at the time the proposal was made, so as to avoid self-consciousness. No?
DXMachina - Feb 02, 2004 8:28:20 am PST #6712 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Yes. No thread stuffing of "foamy" and the like.
Frankenbuddha - Feb 03, 2004 4:28:04 am PST #6713 of 10005
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"
Yes. No thread stuffing of "foamy" and the like.
Good thing "porn" is already a word then, given how some of the old threads got "porn"-ed to the max.
Steph L. - Feb 03, 2004 4:36:31 am PST #6714 of 10005
I look more rad than Lutheranism
given how some of the old threads got "porn"-ed to the max.
Just the old ones?
§ ita § - Feb 03, 2004 4:38:18 am PST #6715 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Well, no one's fighting for the porn count crown anymore.
Steph L. - Feb 03, 2004 4:40:00 am PST #6716 of 10005
I look more rad than Lutheranism
Oh! I misunderstood. I totally forgot about the porn count and Holli's sneaky whitefont.
I thought he just meant the old threads were very porny, implying that the new ones aren't.
Pay no attention to the Teppy behind the curtain.