I can't imagine being perturbed by this project, I'm just curious why they want web data-- what is written here seems different from both spoken English and formal writing.
Buffy ,'Showtime'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I'm just curious why they want web data-- what is written here seems different from both spoken English and formal writing.
My guess is that that's exactly the reason.
Can we turn -age words into gerunds?
t /ducks
We can make new words?
*starts searching for George W. Bush interviews and speeches*
CROMULENT!
I'm all for the idea.
Oh my god, that's so COOOOL.
I'm all for it.
Foamy foamy foamy! AIFG!
I t counts hastily eleventibillion the YES!
That sounds very cool. Is this a situation in which we could approve certain threads for the samples to be taken from (or exclude a given thread)? I don't have a particular concern, but I could see where some people might.
I am so freaking pleased with this idea, and I'm still going to probably argue against it. I'm the privacy freak. I know that it sounds terrific, and I'm sure it will be used responsibly, but my inner paranoia bells are going off something awful.
But I gotta say I love the idea of affecting dictionary verbiage for all eternity. Or, you know, ten years. Whichever comes first.
Corpsified. Definitely Corpsified.