That sounds interesting, although I am not sure that all the words I use are even remotely real! But does this mean "foamy" might be in the dictionary?
Xander ,'Dirty Girls'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
does this mean "foamy" might be in the dictionary?
It otter be.
Perhaps we could otter up lightbulbs to keep discussion together although a vote may or may not actually occur. Very interesting project and I am sure that many of us will have questions.
But Sophia, once they're in the dictionary, they're totally real! Like bootylicious!
We can make new words? Oh yeah.
I offer up 'constructability' as a new word.
I love the idea. Before we open up lightbulbs, I think we probably want to get a little more info, and then some one can craft a proposal that we can vote on.
So... it'd be words, not sentences/full posts?
This is the question that I have. It would be the words without the context?
I am not sure that all the words I use are even remotely real!
You use 'em, right?
If we all decide on a word to make real, I bet we could use it enough to get it drawn.
Motate!
I think it's a very cool idea.