Xander/Buffy ,'Help'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Wait... Is the motion whether Liese is a snickerdoodle of love, or whether Hec should tell Liese that she's a snickerdoodle of love?
Agitator!
Liese, I need to tell you that you are a snickerdoodle of love.
And that's not natter because I want everybody to take a vote on it.
Seconded!
(Can we throw the Bobita thing on this ballot, too?)
Thirded on the snickerdoodle and the bobita things. Let's enact the will of the people, people.
Wait... Is the motion whether Liese is a snickerdoodle of love, or whether Hec should tell Liese that she's a snickerdoodle of love?
Well, he already told her, which is a clear end run around procedure.
So we should warn him or ban him? I'm always forgetting...
Spanking seems more suitable. Procedures be damned.
Didn't we tell him not five months ago that Lies is, in fact, a MALLOMAR of love?
Clearly that baked good is grandfathered. The question is whether one can simultaneously be a snickerdoodle and a Mallomar. I vote "no".
Getting back to Nutty's post about possibly rearranging the sidebar information (FAQ pages, Etiquette pages, How-To pages), I think there are some things we can do to make things easier. There is duplication of the How-To information. As Jon notes, that's not necessarily a bad thing, but it does complicate matters if we have to make a change, and we update the How-To page, but forget that it's also in the FAQ, or vice-versa. It might be better to have it only on the How-To page, and have that page referenced from the FAQ as well as having it's own link. (Or put the How-To stuff in the FAQ, and have the How-To link point to that spot in the FAQ.)
The FAQ could use a good rewrite, too. Case in point, the very first line states:
Warning: This FAQ may contain spoilers up to and including BtVS 6.22 and Angel 3.22.
There is a lot of obsolete information (TV schedules), broken links (Mr. Pointy), dialect that never caught on ("Cousin Clingon"), etc. Even some of the names are archaic: Elisabeth O., kirvin (sic), Nutty Vee, Connie H... And my name is misspelled (pout)!
I guess there are two things here. One is the organization of the information, which is what Nutty was talking about. I do think we can improve that a bit, but have no immediate ideas, other than what I mentioned about the How-To page. The other is updating the contents of the FAQ itself, and I'll be happy to start working on that.
So we should warn him or ban him? I'm always forgetting...
I can back you up with a stern glare.
Warning: This FAQ may contain spoilers up to and including BtVS 6.22 and Angel 3.22.
I had noticed that a while ago, but I didn't see any spoilers in the FAQ for the Buffy S7 or Angel S4, so I left it alone.
There's definitely some other stuff that could use updating, as you note. Go for it!
I'm with DX. I don't really have the time now to do anything, though.
I think that we also need a very concise table of votes saying the date, the item voted on and the result.
I think that we also need a very concise table of votes saying the date, the item voted on and the result.
Ballot questions with result numbers.