What's the rationale behind 7 again? I was just going to go for 10.
There was a concern voiced that some of the numbers getting thrown around were too high. So I was suggesting a compromise between 5 and 10.
Angel ,'Just Rewards (2)'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
What's the rationale behind 7 again? I was just going to go for 10.
There was a concern voiced that some of the numbers getting thrown around were too high. So I was suggesting a compromise between 5 and 10.
I remember making a suggestion a few of months ago to have the Buffy quotes available like the BROQ, so that people can go sit at that generator and amuse themselves.
Michele has a quote generator at [link] Do you want to add it to the links page?
Sorry about my bad post in Beep me. I could have sworn I was in Natter.
Spankings!
I did the same thing, Perkins.
That happened to my Happy Birthday Fay post a couple of days ago. I was pretty sure I wasn't in Beep Me. Sorry about that, ita-who-mends.
Note to self: Read New is dangerous when you're on a conference call and not paying as much attention as you should.
Note that the thread name is in bold face right above the posting box.
(not judging; just pointing it out)
That's the only drawback I've found with "read new" instead of "read next" within a given thread: if you copy something to respond to and hit new, you're likely to find yourself in an entirely different subbed thread. I've managed two "D'OH!" moments, which is a pretty small percentage of Homers, all things considered.
Training myself to look. at. thread. title. before posting. Truly.
Note that the thread name is in bold face right above the posting box.
(not judging; just pointing it out)
Hence the D'oh-- pay attention comment.