I'll second the idea, Kat, but I'm concerned about taking this to lightbulbs in the normal fashion, as I think this particular subject needs to be discussed as long as it needs to be discussed, and locking it into a four day discussion might be too short.

Brenda, I'd envisage that each is a yes/no vote and they stand alone, but they live on the same ballot. If that makes sense.

Sean, I think a four day discussion, at least with the easy ones and with an eye towards hashing out others that may never make it to ballot is possibly the only way to discuss. If we let ourselves talk it forever, we're going to be screwed because we probably won't agree because we will have strong feelings about certain threads. (In my head, I keep thinking, NO! NOT SMALLVILLE. . .)

Raquel

KAT - a couple of more housekeeping items:

• Close Buffy Spoilers Lite

Also?

• Change the name of the Buffy/Angel Spoilers thread to "Angel Spoilers"

Elena re: Quotables - I am sorry. I didn't realize how long the deathmatches ran. I also didn't know your Angel-getting was up in the air.

edited for correct name

Sean, I think a four day discussion, at least with the easy ones and with an eye towards hashing out others that may never make it to ballot is possibly the only way to discuss.

Hmm... good point. Given an indefinite amount of time to discuss, we will dicuss indefinitely.

Brenda, I'd envisage that each is a yes/no vote and they stand alone, but they live on the same ballot. If that makes sense.

Works for me. I just wanted to be sure, since one or two of those might have more dissent than others, though they're all pretty doable, IMO.

Cindy, are those suggestions for Kat to add to her proposal?

Sean, I think a four day discussion, at least with the easy ones and with an eye towards hashing out others that may never make it to ballot is possibly the only way to discuss. If we let ourselves talk it forever, we're going to be screwed because we probably won't agree because we will have strong feelings about certain threads. (In my head, I keep thinking, NO! NOT SMALLVILLE. . .)

Kat - If there's stuff we can't include on the ballot for this proposal, but don't realize that until Lightbulbs discussion makes it evident, can we agree to not moratorium it out of business for six months. I can't think of a for instance, but do you know what I mean.

Elena re: Quotables - I am sorry. I didn't realize how long the deathmatches ran. I also didn't know your Angel-getting was up in the air.

Cindy, we'll be getting Angel on Space on Thursdays (when are they airing in the US?), the big question is when are they going to air on ASN, and will it be before or after the US gets it.

Kat - If there's stuff we can't include on the ballot for this proposal, but don't realize that until Lightbulbs discussion makes it evident, can we agree to not moratorium it out of business for six months. I can't think of a for instance, but do you know what I mean.

Good idea.

(Were we supposed to revisit the length of the moratorium at some point? Or was that something else? My memory is faulty.)

Cindy "Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer" Aug 19, 2003 5:49:31 pm PDT

Kat, I misaddressed the above to Raquel, originally. Housekeeping items, ahoy.

Cindy, are those suggestions for Kat to add to her proposal?

brenda - thank you.

Cindy, we'll be getting Angel on Space on Thursdays (when are they airing in the US?), the big question is when are they going to air on ASN, and will it be before or after the US gets it.

Here, it will be Wednesday nights at 9 (8 central) after Smallville for people who watch on regular WB affiliates.

If we let ourselves talk it forever, we're going to be screwed

Yes.

And seconded.