It seems to me, this boils down to whether or not we can approach a new season, acknowledging who makes up the man cast of a given series, right?
That is my understanding, but I would extend it to the woman cast too. t grin
Bester: Mal. Whaddya need two mechanics for? Mal: I really don't.
'Out Of Gas'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Laura - Jul 29, 2003 5:14:36 am PDT #3720 of 10005
Our wings are not tired.
Cindy - Jul 29, 2003 5:16:20 am PDT #3721 of 10005
Nobody
I liked the "Upfront" language because it was specific. I was intending to add a sentence or two below the proposal explaining what the Upfronts were. But I can go either way.
I only take issue with that, if it is going to be a quibbling point, later on. In other words, if they ink DB, AD, and AA before the upfronts are announced, and don't ink JAR til the next day, do we have to spend the summer pretending JAR isn't coming back?
(All actors' initials are hypothetical.)
Cindy - Jul 29, 2003 5:17:25 am PDT #3722 of 10005
Nobody
That is my understanding, but I would extend it to the woman cast too.
Ewww girls are ucky and gross!
G.R.O.S.S. RULES!!!
Get Rid Of Slimey girlS
t /Calvin
justkim - Jul 29, 2003 5:18:25 am PDT #3723 of 10005
Another social casualty...
Any plot points related to the character's (not the actor's) arrival or departure are to be treated as spoilers.
Ok, a little late here, and I think I get it, but if DB were leaving Angel because he was pregnant, we couuld talk about the circumstances of DB leaving, but NOT the plot devices used to make Angel leave in the how.
Right?
(Circumstance chosen because I'm relatively sure it is not spoilery.)
Cindy - Jul 29, 2003 5:20:00 am PDT #3724 of 10005
Nobody
Right?
Right.
We can't talk about how they're being written in or out. We can say that AD left a life of show-business to kidnap me and take me to a secluded, remote, but well-appointed island retreat.
amych - Jul 29, 2003 5:22:17 am PDT #3725 of 10005
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
And by "me", of course, Cindy means me.
Nutty - Jul 29, 2003 5:22:50 am PDT #3726 of 10005
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."
if DB were leaving Angel because he was pregnant,
If he were, I would hope that the National Enquirer got called at some point!
Cindy - Jul 29, 2003 5:25:20 am PDT #3727 of 10005
Nobody
And by "me", of course, Cindy means me.
*checks sword*
*doesn't have sword to check*
Nope. I don't think so, girlfriend.
brenda m - Jul 29, 2003 5:30:29 am PDT #3728 of 10005
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
I only take issue with that, if it is going to be a quibbling point, later on.
I just want it to be as exact as possible, with no room for arguing what does or doesn't fit. I think the earlier language does that better. But that's Jim's call, I guess.
Jon B. - Jul 29, 2003 5:35:27 am PDT #3729 of 10005
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
That's my worry as well, Brenda.