No, I get the grandfathering. I'm just unclear on when this shift in spoiler policy was discussed before being implemented.
That seems to be the sticking point.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
No, I get the grandfathering. I'm just unclear on when this shift in spoiler policy was discussed before being implemented.
That seems to be the sticking point.
Unless proven otherwise, it seems reasonable to assume that the spoiler policy as stated in the FAQ predates the board and should be grandfathered.
We're trying to determine when the shift occured. Well, I'm not so much trying as saying 'hmm, don't remember' at intervals. But I'm trying to remember, so I think I get partial points.
Not seeming so reasonable from here. If the current wording was something that was discussed in Bureaucracy before being implemented, then yes. It would fall under grandfathering and we can stop talking about it for six to eight weeks. But if there wasn't an actual discussion or consensus, bullshit or otherwise, it doesn't.
Doesn't seem so reasonable to me, either. To me, it's kind of a special case, since it's the INTERPRETATION of the rule that's become stricter over time, without discussion or consensus.
Then forget about interpretation. Consider it grandfathered it as written.
Q. What do you guys consider a spoiler?
A. Anything that hasn't been broadcast. So anything from the show and the preview trailers is okay, anything from TV Guide or anywhere else is a spoiler, including casting news, episode titles and plot twists. No white fonting. Spoilers should only be posted in the spoiler thread.
No drifting or anit-spoilers to one side, no casting news to the other.
I don't want to forget about interpretation. Interpretation matters as much as the letter of the law itself.
But what about board precedent? One could argue that precedents previously set have as much right to grandfathering protection as the FAQ.
This spoiler has FAR more HSQ than any before. I don't think it is precedented.
If the current wording was something that was discussed in Bureaucracy before being implemented, then yes.
Pretty sure it was.
And this is just what we're trying to figure out.