I think I have a Fourth. Given that most people are on your timezone, do you wanna take it over? I'm happy.
Edit - that's to Plei, natch.
River: 1001. 1002. Simon: River... River: Shh. I'm counting between the lightning and the thunder to see if the storm is coming or going. .1005
'The Message'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Jim - Jul 24, 2003 7:48:11 am PDT #3340 of 10005
Ficht nicht mit Der Raketemensch!
Steph L. - Jul 24, 2003 7:48:35 am PDT #3341 of 10005
I look more rad than Lutheranism
We're already over in Light Bulbs, aren't we?
§ ita § - Jul 24, 2003 7:51:23 am PDT #3342 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Yup. Got distracted -- over to bulbs, people!
Aims - Jul 24, 2003 2:36:14 pm PDT #3343 of 10005
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Post deleted by DXMachina on Jul 24, 2003 1:47:30 pm PDT
Dx, this was in Apocolypse. I don't for the life of me remember what I posted there.
Sean K - Jul 24, 2003 2:39:10 pm PDT #3344 of 10005
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
It was natter about meara's pictures, Aim.
Aims - Jul 24, 2003 2:39:43 pm PDT #3345 of 10005
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Fuckity. Thought I was in Bitches. SORRY!
§ ita § - Jul 25, 2003 4:45:29 am PDT #3346 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Nutty, where are we in the documenting of the approved votes?
Wolfram - Jul 25, 2003 4:47:35 am PDT #3347 of 10005
Visilurking
I'm not sure of the procedure, but I believe this post crosses the line of acceptable community standards.
amych - Jul 25, 2003 5:04:36 am PDT #3348 of 10005
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Wolfram, I'm not clear on the intent of your post. Are you asking for an action?
DXMachina - Jul 25, 2003 5:08:46 am PDT #3349 of 10005
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Here's the procedure ( msbelle "Sunnydale Press" Apr 19, 2003 12:02:50 am PDT ):
The following procedure will be in place for taking action for unacceptable behaviour.
1. A user-complainant will try to resolve the complaint on-thread. If unsuccessful,
2. A user-complainant (does not need to be same person) will post in-thread that it's time to meet in Bureaucracy. In Bureaucracy, user-complainant will outline the complaint with linky citations, and request an Action.
3. At least 10 other users in 48 hours second the need for an Action. If 10 other users do not complain within the 48 hour period, no complaint can be made again about that particular incident, unless it is being used to illustrate, with others, a pattern of demon-like behaviour.
4. As soon as the request for action receives 10 seconds, Stompy sets forth Action.
At this point, you're at step 2. The action would be an official warning. Is that what you want to do?