Yeah, we're building a race of frog-people. It's a good time

Xander ,'Selfless'


Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Lyra Jane - Jul 24, 2003 7:07:19 am PDT #3320 of 10005
Up with the sun

"1. Personally, I think this should be for between seasons only.

If a character is added to the opening credits mid-season, it's typically someone who's been recurring who got upgraded, right? I can't think of a time someone was in the main credits before we knew who they were, other than when a show is brand-new. In those cases, the fact the person is in the credits is fairly incidental.

So I'm not sure we need to specify -- but if we do, I'm fine with this modification.


Steph L. - Jul 24, 2003 7:08:58 am PDT #3321 of 10005
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Umm, how do we know prior to a season if someone will be in the opening credits?

If someone is joining the show as "a regular", that means opening credits. Recurring/guests ain't.

Just wanted to clarify.

2. I think that we should make it clear that it is addition or absence of characters, as currently it is impossible to discuss actors other projects.

I think this is important and should be included.


Jim - Jul 24, 2003 7:16:52 am PDT #3322 of 10005
Ficht nicht mit Der Raketemensch!

I think this is important and should be included.

No problems. Want to find a way to add it into the draft?


Jessica - Jul 24, 2003 7:19:12 am PDT #3323 of 10005
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

If we have four seconds, we should move to Lightbulbs, yes?


Jon B. - Jul 24, 2003 7:19:53 am PDT #3324 of 10005
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Instead of "main cast in credits" can we say "regular characters as opposed to recurring".

I like using the credits definition because its more clear. How else does one define "regular"?


§ ita § - Jul 24, 2003 7:20:18 am PDT #3325 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

What's the text as stands, to move to Lightbulbs, FTR?


Steph L. - Jul 24, 2003 7:23:39 am PDT #3326 of 10005
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I think this is important and should be included.

No problems. Want to find a way to add it into the draft?

Hmmm. How about (boldface is my addition) "That major casting spoilers (to the main cast only, not recurring or guest), which are being advertised by Fox, the WB or ME in press advertising or their official website, are no longer spoilers, and should be discussed in the show threads. This includes cast additions or departures. The Main Cast are those characters who appear in the opening credits."


Jim - Jul 24, 2003 7:28:47 am PDT #3327 of 10005
Ficht nicht mit Der Raketemensch!

ita:

"That major casting spoilers (to the main cast only, not recurring or guest), which are being advertised by Fox, the WB or ME in press advertising or their official website, are no longer spoilers, and should be discussed in the show threads. The Main Cast are those characters who appear in the opening credits."

Jon

How else does one define "regular"?

My understanding is that "regular" is the industry term meaning "in opening credits". So the only difference is clarity - how many people are unclear on the term?


Jim - Jul 24, 2003 7:29:32 am PDT #3328 of 10005
Ficht nicht mit Der Raketemensch!

Steph, I'm happy with that change.


Steph L. - Jul 24, 2003 7:29:49 am PDT #3329 of 10005
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Jim, you don't like my suggested addition?

t edit I posted too quickly.