And a repeat of Elena's in Natter.
And I agree with Jon that the spoiler thread option is the least inconvenience for the shortest amount of time without thread proliferation.
eta x-post
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
And a repeat of Elena's in Natter.
And I agree with Jon that the spoiler thread option is the least inconvenience for the shortest amount of time without thread proliferation.
eta x-post
Whitefonted the natter post. Sorry for the delay.
I deleted the post in Angel (shouldn't've have deleted -- I acted quickly without thinking), and (correctly, I think) edited the post in Natter.
heh - Amy edited after me, but must've already had the edit window open, so her whitefont overrode my editing out.
Personally, I don't don't think whitefont is strong enough, since we don't normally allow whitefonted spoilers in the non-spoiler threads, but I don't feel strongly about it.
I agree, Jon, just the white font isn't enough.
I actually think you're right about the whitefont, Jon -- I just went for the first fix that came to mind. But let's try not to edit at the same time this time, 'kay?
Edit -- done. And now I need to step away from the Edit link.
Hee. Thanks Amy.
What was spoilery? I just remember posting the description of the movie
Daniel - It makes evident a casting spoiler on Angel. - (because even explaining why it is spoilery could give it away)
What was spoilery? I just remember posting the description of the movie
It sounded like a series from the quote. I think that's the spoilery part - if it's just a TV movie, it wasn't clear.