I vote for "Natter 2 x (3+4): It could be mathier" as well,
Spike ,'Selfless'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I'm feeling the mathy love.
(that's a vote for 2 x {3+4})
There'll be a lot of mathier.
But just the one hormone bomb.
IJS.
Natter 2 x (3+4): It could be mathier
This this this.
There'll be a lot of mathier. But just the one hormone bomb.
IJS.
Remember what I said about the waffling? I think I'm doing it again.
Right there with you Sean.
This time it's not waffling. This time it's the inexorability of my point.
Whole different vibe.
This time it's the inexorability of my point.
And you used the word 'inexorability' too. That's some serious mojo right there.
It does seem to be true that math will be with us always. Nothing comes to me for 15, so I tend to skip ahead to 2 to the 4th. (Too tired to figure out if I can superscript.) I'm sure Nilly could come up with an equation for almost any thread number.
I wish that there was some other term for those of us who read but do not post. "Lurking" sounds so sinister, as though we are skulking around in the bushes while the rest of you have a party.
You're not lurking. You're standing about. It's a whole different vibe. Can't call you "standabouters," though. How about "lurchers"? Lurch, from the Addams Family, was a man of few words, yet very loyal and able to keep the family secrets to himself. (The true implication is that you are all our silent audience of lurching, drunken monkeys, but if you want to contest that, you're just going to have to sober up and delurch.)