Mal: Does.. um.. does this seem kind of tight? Kaylee: Shows off your backside.

'Shindig'


Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Hil R. - Jul 08, 2003 6:16:03 pm PDT #3014 of 10005
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

Natter 2 x (3+4): It could be mathier

This this this.


Sean K - Jul 08, 2003 6:24:03 pm PDT #3015 of 10005
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

There'll be a lot of mathier. But just the one hormone bomb.

IJS.

Remember what I said about the waffling? I think I'm doing it again.


Lee - Jul 08, 2003 6:29:48 pm PDT #3016 of 10005
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

Right there with you Sean.


§ ita § - Jul 08, 2003 6:47:03 pm PDT #3017 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

This time it's not waffling. This time it's the inexorability of my point.

Whole different vibe.


Sean K - Jul 08, 2003 6:48:35 pm PDT #3018 of 10005
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

This time it's the inexorability of my point.

And you used the word 'inexorability' too. That's some serious mojo right there.


Ginger - Jul 08, 2003 6:50:48 pm PDT #3019 of 10005
"It didn't taste good. It tasted soooo horrible. It tasted like....a vodka martini." - Matilda

It does seem to be true that math will be with us always. Nothing comes to me for 15, so I tend to skip ahead to 2 to the 4th. (Too tired to figure out if I can superscript.) I'm sure Nilly could come up with an equation for almost any thread number.


Noumenon - Jul 08, 2003 8:04:08 pm PDT #3020 of 10005
No other candidate is asking the hard questions, like "Did geophysicists assassinate Jim Henson?" or "Why is there hydrogen in America's water supply?" --defective yeti

I wish that there was some other term for those of us who read but do not post. "Lurking" sounds so sinister, as though we are skulking around in the bushes while the rest of you have a party.

You're not lurking. You're standing about. It's a whole different vibe. Can't call you "standabouters," though. How about "lurchers"? Lurch, from the Addams Family, was a man of few words, yet very loyal and able to keep the family secrets to himself. (The true implication is that you are all our silent audience of lurching, drunken monkeys, but if you want to contest that, you're just going to have to sober up and delurch.)


Holli - Jul 08, 2003 8:13:57 pm PDT #3021 of 10005
an overblown libretto and a sumptuous score/ could never contain the contradictions I adore

oh! I love "standabouters." It's a bit unwieldy, I'll admit, but when has wordiness ever deterred us from a good in-joke?


Sean K - Jul 08, 2003 8:17:12 pm PDT #3022 of 10005
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

How 'bout "extras?" Filling out the scene, but without any dialogue, yet. Instead of "delurking," we would say they "have lines!"


Aims - Jul 08, 2003 8:21:57 pm PDT #3023 of 10005
Shit's all sorts of different now.

Yes, and then, when they "have lines", they hafta give us $1500 to be a "real" Buffista.