New Bitches thread, please?
I don't know what title.
Nobody can tell Marmaduke what to do. That's my kind of dog.
Trick ,'First Date'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Am-Chau Yarkona - Jun 13, 2003 7:52:00 am PDT #2547 of 10005
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty
P.M. Marc - Jun 13, 2003 7:53:20 am PDT #2548 of 10005
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
Already been brung.
I went with Susan's because, well, I liked it, and it was the most recent thing I'd seen.
Am-Chau Yarkona - Jun 13, 2003 7:54:10 am PDT #2549 of 10005
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty
Thanks, Plei.
DavidS - Jun 13, 2003 8:27:51 am PDT #2550 of 10005
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Natter 13: Maybe it's not such a good idea for you to piss us off.
I like it.
Cashmere - Jun 13, 2003 8:28:47 am PDT #2551 of 10005
Now tagless for your comfort.
Natter 13: Maybe it's not such a good idea for you to piss us off.
Oh, yeah. This is perfect.
P.M. Marc - Jun 13, 2003 8:36:59 am PDT #2552 of 10005
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
Oh, I love that.
billytea - Jun 13, 2003 8:41:22 am PDT #2553 of 10005
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
The thought does occur to me that while HostRocket won't see the thread title, occasional newbies might do as they find this site and its attendant warning not to piss us off. Is it too belligerent for people who are unfamiliar with the backstory?
DavidS - Jun 13, 2003 8:54:22 am PDT #2554 of 10005
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Is it too belligerent for people who are unfamiliar with the backstory?
I don't think so. (a) it's a show quote (b) we're snarky (c) most folks lurk before posting so they'd know what we're about. Also, other thread titles aren't so crabby.
billytea - Jun 13, 2003 9:02:34 am PDT #2555 of 10005
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
I don't think so. (a) it's a show quote (b) we're snarky (c) most folks lurk before posting so they'd know what we're about. Also, other thread titles aren't so crabby.
True, but (a) Not everyone will recognise it off the bat, nor will all those who recognise it know why we chose it and that it's not directed at, say, them (b) I don't think 'snarky' is the first word that comes to mind concerning this proposed title, I mean we're considering it because essentially we were sufficiently pissed off at HR to discuss, albeit reject, legal action - that's beyond snarky to me (c) they'll see the thread title before they even decide whether to lurk, let alone post.
It may not be a big deal, really, it just makes me a bit uneasy as a thread title.
Laura - Jun 13, 2003 9:03:54 am PDT #2556 of 10005
Our wings are not tired.
Is it too belligerent for people who are unfamiliar with the backstory?
We don't need no stinking context.