If you violate the terms of a suspension, you get banned. Period. End of story. A person who actually cares about this community would not violate the suspension.
Angel: I appreciate you guys looking out for Connor all summer. It's just—he's confused. He needs time. That's all. Fred: Right. Time, and some corporal punishment with a large heavy mallet. Not that I'm bitter.
'Just Rewards (2)'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Jesse - May 12, 2003 8:57:20 am PDT #1714 of 10005
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Sophia Brooks - May 12, 2003 8:58:19 am PDT #1715 of 10005
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
I'm with Jesse.
Also, kill me now.
Jesse - May 12, 2003 9:00:43 am PDT #1716 of 10005
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Suddenly I feel like a battered spouse: "But he's so great a lot of the time! And he didn't really mean it. And it's my fault, really -- if only I had done things differently, it wouldn't have happened...." Fuck that. I'm sorry, but really.
Dana - May 12, 2003 9:01:30 am PDT #1717 of 10005
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
And he chose to take a voluntary suspension to prevent a kerfuffle, so that he could "do the time" and come back without rancor.
This, incidentally, was not my understanding. My understanding was that he volunteered to leave, period, so as to avoid more unpleasantness. I was never under the impression that he was serving out a voluntary suspension.
And what Jesse said.
askye - May 12, 2003 9:02:37 am PDT #1718 of 10005
Thrive to spite them
I can not believe that this is coming up again.
Also, Wolfram I think your timing is really bad, we haven't finished dealing with the current issue at hand, which is currently frustrating a lot of people.
Cashmere - May 12, 2003 9:05:41 am PDT #1719 of 10005
Now tagless for your comfort.
Wolfram, with all due respect to you--Anathama/Schmoker/Mieskie are all the same person. If one breaks the rules of the suspension--it doesn't leave any leeway for alternate posting personalities.
This is all I'm going to say on the matter. I think the banning should stand and I don't want to see this place implode because of this.
Cashmere - May 12, 2003 9:07:17 am PDT #1720 of 10005
Now tagless for your comfort.
cereal to add: WROD to the bad timing of this suggestion.
Wolfram - May 12, 2003 9:14:49 am PDT #1721 of 10005
Visilurking
Also, Wolfram I think your timing is really bad, we haven't finished dealing with the current issue at hand, which is currently frustrating a lot of people.
My timing sucks but I didn't pick it. I didn't want to bring this up. But the suspension was over a couple of days ago, and the account was not reinstated. Maybe I understood the situation wrong, maybe I didn't. But, we all are here posting and there's a former member who's not and in my opinion has done the time. I thought he was on a suspension.
And Jesse, let's not compare this to battered spouse syndrome. Please.
Am-Chau Yarkona - May 12, 2003 9:18:01 am PDT #1722 of 10005
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty
Um... (I have to ask, okay? I don't want an argument, but the a greatest of respect, I want to know, and I'm afraid I may regret this)... why are you bringing this up, Wolfram? I have a feeling that this should be something the stompies raise, if it's raised at all.
Jesse - May 12, 2003 9:18:02 am PDT #1723 of 10005
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
He was on suspension until he kept posting here, at which point he was banned. Even with different names, it was the same person. That person is now banned. Period.