10 is also a pretty high number considering the fact that we are only counting as a "second" someone who says, "yes, I think that X's behavior warrants an official warning" (as opposed to saying, "I think that X is annoying, but he has not violated CS").
'Serenity'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
I'm sorry that what I was suggesting came across as such. I was trying to suggest a compromise, because even though I don't share your concern to the same level you do, since two people I respect (you and Gar) have both mentioned it, I'd like to see it at least discussed.
And I'm sorry if I came across as snippy, Cindy.
The stompy veto could prevent a scenario where, say, another board perished and 15 or 20 refugees decided to teraform the phoenix to their satisfaction.
Can you imagine? A bunch of Rules G*rls telling Allyson not to cuss?
msbelle "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" Apr 18, 2003 3:34:39 pm EDT
Is that the final wording, msbelle?
I'm going out for a while. I put up a ballot at [link] (the usual place). If wording needs to be changed, I can do so, but it won't happen until 1 or 2 am or so. Also, has ita pointed votes@buffistas.org to whoever is counting this time?
Jon, yes, that is the final wording as I would like it to stand.
I will put a link in Press to the voting place at midnight.
I trust ita to see that the counter person is set up and this thread is closed.
Who is the counter?
I don't remember. Maybe Deena?
You are number six.
I certainly can be...amazing, my timing at catching up.
Serasempre AT cox DOT net.
Email forwards redirected, sir msbelle, sir.