Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
I think if we have an MCU thread and a streaming thread, all the Marvel streaming stuff should stay in MCU.
That's a nice obvious division. We declare that Marvel trumps streaming, therefore if Stan Lee can take credit for it, it goes in the MCU (unless that brings up a heretofore unknown to me can of worms regarding Stan Lee).
I oppose thread proliferation because of my feels, not just what I think ita would have wanted. In fact I have no idea what ita would have wanted in this case. My stance is now, as it always has been, that proliferation causes a Balkanization of our community, resulting in an increasing number of sub communities with decreasing interaction between the group as a whole. I believe it is not a dichotomy as you suggest, Connie; I don't think lack of proliferation causes us to be a bell jar, nor do I think proliferation inherently makes us a living breathing community. Could we stagnate? Absolutely. But we also could have over the past nearly two decades we have been together, for a variety of reasons. As of yet, we have proved more resilient than the vast majority of online (and a good number of offline) communities of which I am aware.
On the proliferation issue:
I'm not looking for the kind of easy-thread-making we had at WX. HOWEVER, that wasn't a bad thing. That fostered many conversations.
And that's what I'm down for: Creating spaces for interesting conversations. That's our lifeblood.
Did Smallville *really* deserve it's own thread? I don't know, but if it didn't we wouldn't have had cocksicles.
Skipping to the end of the thread to offer to count the votes, if nobody else volunteered already (it's the only way I can contribute to either the discussion or the voting, and I do want to do *something*, if I possibly can).
Maybe we could look at this a different way. As more and more of us cut cable and cobble together online ways to see our shows, both the spoiler policies and the distinction between broadcast, cable and premium cable are becoming increasingly irrelevant. Why not ditch the concept of categorizing shows by where they are broadcast or streamed? That's essentially what the Marvel proposal does. We could get rid of the Premium Cable thread, make the Cable Drama thread a general Drama thread and discuss all SF/fantasy in Boxed Set. That would remove the awkwardness of the the Cable Drama thread definition [Thread for the discussion of original cable drama--but not scifi/fantasy (that's Boxed Set!) or pay-to-play (that's Premium Cable!)]. It would also give people a place to discuss shows like Grey's Anatomy without having to whitefont it in Natter. One advantage to this approach is that it puts more people together rather than increasing the number of silos.
I am not the one to define spoilers, since I don't care about being spoiled. If people feel that a streaming show needs something like a week's embargo, someone could be the hall monitor for that show and announce in thread "Discussion of X begins now."
That's an interesting idea.
In a way, TV is getting more like movies - it's available on X day but we might individually watch it any time after that. So maybe the spoiler policies should converge.
As of yet, we have proved more resilient than the vast majority of online (and a good number of offline) communities of which I am aware.
OMG, yes. I've been away from the board for years, and having posted now for a couple of weeks I still know virtually everyone. It's unreal.
One advantage to this approach is that it puts more people together rather than increasing the number of silos.
Speaking only for myself, the more shows a thread encompasses, the less of a chance that I'll participate in that thread because of spoiler issues. For example, I'm behind on this season of Justified but have 7 episodes sitting on my DVR. I am current on Mad Men. Last week I really wanted to discuss the latter, but jumping into Cable Drama made it clear that I would spoil myself for the former so I stayed away. Had a similar issue with Daredevil (that I'd seen) and GoT (that's on my DVR) in Premium Cable.
Ideally there'd by a Wolfram thread where everyone can only discuss the shows I'm caught up on.
I still know virtually everyone.
But only virtually.
Ideally there'd by a Wolfram thread where everyone can only discuss the shows I'm caught up on.
Proliferationist!
But seriously, the assumption that there's any way to assume a particular broadcast date for an episode -- or even that there will be one in any meaningful way, in the case of streaming-only shows, where the date is really for a season rather than an ep -- has been broken for me for years now. It doesn't keep me out of threads, because I don't care about being spoiled, but it does keep me from starting any discussions there, because I honestly have no clue any more what or when or where...
I don't know what the answer is for this, and I don't want to hijack the specific matter of MCU discussion (which is awesome!) with a lot of navelgazing about the future of television, release schedules, what a sensible unit to discuss might be, whether it's sensible to think in terms of broadcast, cable or whatever else, and whether the magic elves in the box really are talking just to me me me me. But just like in the industry itself, the problem isn't going to go away.