IS burned at the stake the next step after banning? DO you need 10 seconds or just matches?
Hands! Hands in new places!
Willow ,'Storyteller'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
msbelle - Apr 17, 2003 3:48:35 pm PDT #899 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
Cindy - Apr 17, 2003 3:50:09 pm PDT #900 of 10289
Nobody
Matches.
Or a lighter.
Or a Boy Scout and two dry sticks.
amych - Apr 17, 2003 3:50:51 pm PDT #901 of 10289
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
IS burned at the stake the next step after banning?
Burning is automatic if the bannee is is a WITCH, which is ridiculous 'cause wicca good and woman power love-the-earth and I'll be over here....
Nutty - Apr 17, 2003 3:50:53 pm PDT #902 of 10289
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."
So, Cindy, your answer would be toasted cheese...?
thessaly - Apr 17, 2003 3:51:37 pm PDT #903 of 10289
"...and that calls for some hard-hitting, potentially violent SCIENCE!"
IS burned at the stake the next step after banning? DO you need 10 seconds or just matches?
Should we add a can of gas to the proposal for efficiency? I think we should also use printouts of the offending posts in triplicate for kindling.
Jesse - Apr 17, 2003 3:55:16 pm PDT #904 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I've always wanted to do that thing where you light a whole trail of gas with your cigarette and blow up a car or something. Can that be part of it?
Please?
Cindy - Apr 17, 2003 3:57:13 pm PDT #905 of 10289
Nobody
So, Cindy, your answer would be toasted cheese...?
You know when it's kinda bubbly on the outside, and all gooey inside?...
(and now that I remember we're discussing your ass, maybe not)
Should we add a can of gas to the proposal for efficiency? I think we should also use printouts of the offending posts in triplicate for kindling.
Buffistas have never used a can of gas for efficiency. There has always been consensus on this, and we grandfathered it into the by-laws. We refuse to support the man, yo, and his incessant campaign to keep us leaning upon the foul crutch that are fossil fuels. Besides, it's smelly. So just namaste, you.
thessaly - Apr 17, 2003 4:03:58 pm PDT #906 of 10289
"...and that calls for some hard-hitting, potentially violent SCIENCE!"
I've always wanted to do that thing where you light a whole trail of gas with your cigarette and blow up a car or something. Can that be part of it?
Please?
Only if you can find the original poster to rewrite the proposal.
Buffistas have never used a can of gas for efficiency. There has always been consensus on this, and we grandfathered it into the by-laws. We refuse to support the man, yo, and his incessant campaign to keep us leaning upon the foul crutch that are fossil fuels. Besides, it's smelly. So just namaste, you.
This is a false consensus, run through by a bunch of 'Green Kids' while I was taking a nap and fails to take into account my uniquely valid perspective as a Clueless MoMo. I am offended by your blanket statements about fossil fuel users, and will take it over to Bureaucracy so it can come back here in another 24 hours.
This is what happens when you're trying to duplicate 2 season's worth of Buffy VCDs for someone. Do not attempt this at home. All sarcasm above my own. Opinions stated above does not remotely reflect the policy of management, Buffistas, or Small Furry Creatures from Alpha Centauri
Michele T. - Apr 17, 2003 10:49:30 pm PDT #907 of 10289
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi
I have seen Jesse not-in-a-cowboy-hat. So I move that that proposal be changed to "Jesse SHOULD always wear a cowboy hat," in which case I vote yes.
Am-Chau Yarkona - Apr 18, 2003 3:15:47 am PDT #908 of 10289
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty
Burning is automatic if the bannee is is a WITCH
I propose that the use of ASSCAPS in conjunction with the word 'witch' always be met with a simple, calm, "She turned me into a NEWT!"