And I'd say take the No Preference option off.
Yeah, but leaving it on is such beautiful irony.
'Potential'
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
And I'd say take the No Preference option off.
Yeah, but leaving it on is such beautiful irony.
Do you need someone to count votes?
Always!
I was just skimming to the end in order to make sure we have someone to count votes!
So if Perkins can't do it, I'm more than willing to.
t back to catching up
I VOTE NILLY
or no preference.
I don't feel the numbers have changed enough to justify changing the quorum threshold. It makes sense to me that the proposer can choose whether to include NP, but if it bugs people that much I'll deal with losing the option.
This is how I feel, too.
Yeah, but leaving it on is such beautiful irony.
Pretty much my thought.
Who do we have as vote counter?
Who do we have as vote counter?
Perkins volunteered, no?
She also jokingly volunteered Nilly here ( Perkins "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" May 18, 2008 10:02:55 am PDT), so I'm going to wait and see how that one washes out.