and goes to post in Bureaucracy
you mean after posting in the thread where foot in mouth occured, right?
I am actually still not seeing the problem. can someone else see what I am missing?
'Objects In Space'
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
and goes to post in Bureaucracy
you mean after posting in the thread where foot in mouth occured, right?
I am actually still not seeing the problem. can someone else see what I am missing?
Bureaucracy's only supposed to happen after in-thread failed. In thread can't fail if B's not around, really.
look ita smart - ita talk clear.
Just so's we're clear -- I don't want a pony.
well duh. a bunny with a pony would just be silly.
Bureaucracy's only supposed to happen after in-thread failed. In thread can't fail if B's not around, really.
Let's look at the latest example. X number of people at various points asked Z to clarify, or apologize, or otherwise modify her behavior. Finally Kat, who had NEVER asked for such, said, "I'm taking this to Bureaucracy." What if *that* happens again, when hypothetical Problem Poster B just happens to no longer be in the thread? I'm surprised no one else thinks this is even remotely likely to happen.
I'm surprised no one else thinks this is even remotely likely to happen.
I never said all that.
But Z had been asked to clarify, was around, hadn't clarified, and someone took it to Sartre.
So saying "well, what if that happened, but different" doesn't quite work. I'm assuming that the poster that takes it to Sartre is going to get a "Well, let's see what the clarification is or isn't, first."
Well, I'll just hope that everyone else is right and I am wrong and nobody will ever be going about their life only to come back later and find out that they've been zapped in absentia. 'Cause that would suck.
I think that's why the "attempt clarification first" is there.