And we live to fight another day.

Mal ,'Objects In Space'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


§ ita § - Aug 24, 2007 7:48:38 am PDT #7765 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

So no one thinks the following hypothetical exchange isn't . . . off?

To me that's not an exchange, so the offness is moot. It is merely consecutive posting. If I wanted to dominate the room with my grieving then Natter is the wrong place for me to try and do it. It is, after all, Natter. Topics cross, and I don't blame anyone for it.


brenda m - Aug 24, 2007 7:50:45 am PDT #7766 of 10289
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

However, just because I'm bitching about the shitty day I had or Vortex has nowhere to live (sorry!) would really not have any bearing on the appropriateness of the tv conversation.

That said, I do agree that it has a distraction factor that does impact the tv discussion, and that was one thing that was made pretty clear in the experimentals.


Jesse - Aug 24, 2007 7:51:20 am PDT #7767 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I think the question of the variety of topics in Natter is a non-issue. My issue is that I don't think there was all that much focused discussion in the experimental drama thread, where there weren't other topics coming into play.

Edit: If my math is right, the experimental drama thread averaged fewer than 18 posts a day.


Ailleann - Aug 24, 2007 7:55:46 am PDT #7768 of 10289
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda

What was the spoiler policy in the experimental drama thread? Perhaps a difference in whitefont rules would cause a change in the discussion?


Jesse - Aug 24, 2007 7:59:58 am PDT #7769 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I don't have a good sense of the number of people who would be driven away by whitefont vs the number of people driven away by lack of whitefont, but there is definitely a group of each.


Vortex - Aug 24, 2007 8:08:18 am PDT #7770 of 10289
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

What was the spoiler policy in the experimental drama thread? Perhaps a difference in whitefont rules would cause a change in the discussion?

I think that it was NAFDA


msbelle - Aug 24, 2007 8:10:09 am PDT #7771 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

for comparison, this thread, which I consider slow moving, for this proposal discussion, has generated more than 18 posts a day.

- some will say it being a bucket kept enough people out to diminish the convo. - some will say they hate WF at all, so that kept them away.

no way to know to be quite honest. probably some of both with a little of

- just because some WANT in depth discussions on shows doesn't meant that enough people here will participate to sustain it.


esse - Aug 24, 2007 11:05:28 am PDT #7772 of 10289
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

When do I need to have a final proposal put together?


Jon B. - Aug 24, 2007 11:32:49 am PDT #7773 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I need final wording by tomorrow morning.

I also need a volunteer vote counter.

I would strongly recommend including "no preference" as an option, especially on the spoiler policy pieces of the ballot. Otherwise, we risk having enough votes to set up a thread, but not enough to determine the spoiler policy.


Topic!Cindy - Aug 24, 2007 12:21:33 pm PDT #7774 of 10289
What is even happening?

I'd also recommend having whether or not we have a spoiler policy be one item, and giving the possible spoiler policy choices in a separate item.