Harken: You fought with Captain Reynolds in the war? Zoe: Fought with a lot of people in the war. Harken: And your husband? Zoe: Fight with him sometimes, too.

'Bushwhacked'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


SailAweigh - Jul 25, 2007 7:24:37 am PDT #7469 of 10289
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

I felt like there was a lot more sustained discussion with the thread, and it didn't get unwieldy for me.

brenda is me, or I am her. Whichever.

it becomes difficult to have a sustained discussion about it in Natter because so many of the potential discussers are off in the dedicated thread

I don't find this a downside. I very rarely found anyone discussing the shows at the time I was watching them. Once a show hit the west coast, you could get some discussion but by then I was in bed. And I found it very unwiedly to go back anywhere from 100-200 posts to find it. Once the experimental thread opened, there was much more discussion that I was able to participate in. Plus, it was a heck of a lot easier to actually find the discussions that were of interest.


esse - Jul 25, 2007 7:51:58 am PDT #7470 of 10289
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!

I think that, rather than dividing by network, it makes more sense to divide by characteristics of the shows, if we're worried about over-population of a single thread.

This, yes, this! I think it is worth revisiting, at this point, the genre-type thing we began to discuss a few months ago and then ended up dropping when the experimental threads were proposed.

I do think the experimental thread type deal was fine for Nonfic, and I think it was less fine for Cable Drama, which still smarts slightly to me for its creation anyway. For the Network Comedy-Dramas, I would think we could do a little more thorough thought about whether divisions like Procedurals, Mystery of the Week, etc. would be more apt for what we want.

I do not, however, want this discussion to get shunted in favor of tv talk for these shows solely in Natter, because I don't think that sustains discussion for any period of time beyond the initial airing and is inaccessible for reasons others have stated.


Denise - Jul 25, 2007 8:57:41 am PDT #7471 of 10289

I think that if we try to split up the threads by type of show (procedurals, medical, etc...) that the threads might not generate enough discussion to justify their existence. The experimental thread, which I know some didn't like, seemed to have just the right balance of going back and forth from show to show. While I'm sure we could make a huge list of Procedurals, I don't think all of them would be discussed, if the results of the experimental thread are anything to go by.

I liked the experimental thread how it was. Spoilers in general don't bother me though, and when they did, I just stayed out of thread until I had watched the episode of the show in question.


brenda m - Jul 25, 2007 9:06:50 am PDT #7472 of 10289
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

I think that if we try to split up the threads by type of show (proceudrals, medical, etc...) that the threads might not generate enough discussion to justify their existence. The experimental thread, which I know some didn't like, seemed to have just the right balance of going back and forth from show to show.

Agreed. I think the thread was more interesting to read, too, with the variety of shows and show types that came up.

And for some reason the category divisions (procedural, medical, etc.) smack more of "general tv discussion board" to me than individual show threads or the big buckets do.


Vortex - Jul 25, 2007 9:10:46 am PDT #7473 of 10289
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

I liked the experimental threads fine. I would like them just convert to permanent.


Pix - Jul 25, 2007 9:15:44 am PDT #7474 of 10289
The status is NOT quo.

Not everyone has time to read 100+ messages in a few hours, especially when only a few of them are about what you want to talk about.

That's the same problem I have with bucket threads for TV in general, though the total post number per hour may be lower than in Natter. As I said in our last discussion about SPN, though, I'm just expressing my opinion so that I'm not a silent minority. I know I likely won't be able to talk about TV at b.org since I can't keep up with all the shows in the buckets and don't like to be spoiled for the ones I do plan to eventually watch. If there's a majority who feels bucket drama would work--or maybe bucket Law Enforcement and bucket other drama--I think giving them a home outside of Natter isn't a bad idea.


Fred Pete - Jul 25, 2007 9:16:19 am PDT #7475 of 10289
Ann, that's a ferret.

The experimentals also worked for me. I've been waiting several weeks for the right time to propose reopening the Comedy thread.


NoiseDesign - Jul 25, 2007 9:37:40 am PDT #7476 of 10289
Our wings are not tired

I'm just adding my voice to say I'm one of the folks the experimentals did NOT work for.


Jesse - Jul 25, 2007 9:41:03 am PDT #7477 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

The thing with the experimental drama thread is that in practice, people talked about a much smaller number of shows than might have been technically "covered" in the thread definition, but not everyone knew that, so people might have stayed away from the thread to avoid being spoiled for Show X, when they actually wouldn't have been spoiled, and would have been able to discuss Show Y no problem.


Liese S. - Jul 25, 2007 9:43:54 am PDT #7478 of 10289
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

I don't see how we're not a general tv board already. I don't like it, but I think we're there.