It crystallised for you for Heroes, but not for Eureka. What was the difference for you there?

Just a reminder of how this voting thing works, since it\'s been six months:

Four days of discussion followed by three days of voting. Theo will need to come up with final wording by early Sunday, at which time I\'ll open the \"ballot box\". We\'ll need a volunteer to count votes. Voting will end next Wednesday morning.

Adding a thread for heroes will have exactly zero measurable effect on server performance.

Worries about server performance should not factor into anyone's decision on whether to add a thread for Heroes or not.

Adding a thread for heroes will have exactly zero measurable effect on server performance.

Let's say for the sake of argument that we suddenly doubled the number of threads on the board. Would the load on the server stay the same, or would the amount of activity grow to fill the number of threads?

Adding a Heroes thread does have the possibility of adding load on the server. We could, in theory, add a whole new bunch of users who are Heroes fans. In a worst-case scenario, we could start attracting Heroes VIPs to the board, and increase the server load dramatically.

The point I'm trying to make is that there's no way to predict what kind of impact a new thread will have on the board.

Adding a thread for heroes will have exactly zero measurable effect on server performance.

We need to talk, then. Because I've been attributing slower query times to increased size of the table being queried. All the relevant queries are tuned as finely as I can get them.

If there's something else, I need to get that fix on the mental to-do list instead.

eta:

Adding a Heroes thread does have the possibility of adding load on the server.

I'd say more than the possibility. Ease of making more posts has already been cited as a rationale, plus that always happens anyway.

Frankly, I think that if any show should get it's own thread, it's BSG. Perhaps I only "notice" the number of posts because I don't watch it, while I do watch and want to read about Heroes.

I like Heroes in Boxed Set. I don't think it's sufficiently more special than SPN (which I don't watch) or BSG (which I do) to deserve its own thread, unless we break Boxed Set down completely and just have individual threads for everything.

For me, the risk is that Heroes becomes another Lost -- if they can't sustain their current level of storytelling for multiple seasons, we won't be able to sustain our current level of discussion about it. I'd really rather not end up with another thread consisting of 10 posts a week saying "WTF? Why am I still watching this?" I prefer threads with more permanance and flexibility.

(PS, I also think we should close the Lost thread. But that's another proposal.)

ITA with Jessica, esp. on the Lost thing.

I also think we should close the Lost thread. But that\'s another proposal.

Doesn\'t need to be. Theo could add that in, IJS.

I like Heroes in Boxed Set. I don't think it's sufficiently more special than SPN (which I don't watch) or BSG (which I do) to deserve its own thread, unless we break Boxed Set down completely and just have individual threads for everything.

As much as I would love the HEROES discussion consolidated, I gotta agree with this (and with the comparisons to the LOST thread, and the potential for the show to go off the rails in a similar way). I almost feel that if a BOXED SET show got it's own thread, it should be EUREKA because CF has posted here extensively, though pretty much only (or only - I forget) during the initial run of the show. But that would be another vote, obviously.

ETA or not, depending on how Theo words the proposal.