I'm more confused by ita's first sentence then I am by reading whitefonted conversations about various tv shows in Natter.

I don't like the general tv thread, either, but if people really want something like that, I wonder if there would be a way to do a few/some Boxed Sets that would cover more or less everything, but in easy-to-chew segments (Current, Premium, Reality, I don't know what else we would need). It seems like that would be more workable than a general tv thread.

I'm more confused by ita's first sentence then I am by reading whitefonted conversations about various tv shows in Natter.

Exactly my point.

Pretty much.

I think.

I'm more confused by ita's first sentence then I am by reading whitefonted conversations about various tv shows in Natter.

You mean her second sentence, which simply supports the statement made in her first sentence.

I may mean her untyped third sentence, that clarifies it all.

At the moment I don't have Premium channels because I found I wasn't home to watch stuff on a timely basis and that left the premium channels as playtoys for the boys.

In general I support the notion of the new thread for those that want the concentrated discussion. I enjoy seeing tv talk in Natter, but mostly I don't watch the shows.

So, um, I'll probably vote no pref because it's good either way.

I would just like to be able to find intelligent viewpoints about shows I am actually watching. Today. Not back in the day.

First? As a PR fan, I'm not not having PR conversations well in Natter. I'm having them just fine. And the PR whitefont tends to amuse. I skip it when I haven't watched my Tivo'd copy, I scroll back to it when I have, I highlight, I laff, and laff. It's fine, and I skip a bunch of Natter, too.

Second? I definitely am in favor of ita's bright line. Movies should stay movies, because their release mechanisms, duration of discussion, and finite narrative structure differentiate them from television, even mini-series type television. This thread, should it come up, should have some clearly definable (even to Buffistas) boundary for what discussion should occur there.

Thirdly, I agree with Nutty about the general reason for bringing up a new thread; that it overwhelms Natter by volume. While I sympathize with Corwood for his problem in Natter overwhelming his particular discussion, I am not convinced that adding a thread is the right decision. Could we look at other possible solutions? I was going to suggest some sort of tagging system, but I don't think that will solve any problems that the search function doesn't already.

And lastly, I hesitate to bring this up, because it may not be an issue for anyone. But I'd rather voice it and have everyone say, "What?" than ignore it.

Is there a privilege issue with branding a thread specifically for premium channel movies? Some people (myself included) will not likely be able to afford premium channels, and this thread will explicitly exclude them. It won't intentionally be an economic barrier, but it will functionally be. Is this an issue for us? Is this something we care about? Does it affect the way we want to structure our boards?

eta: In some ways, I suppose the boards themselves are economically self-selecting, because I have to be able to afford the internet, television, and leisure time to even be here. So maybe it doesn't matter that much more?

this thread will explicitly exclude them

I don't have premium channels, but I'm watching Deadwood via DVD. I don't think it is more exclusive than the movie thread--I don't know if anyone can't afford to see movies here, but it's certainly possible.

I don't think we can sensibly be bound by making sure every thread is financially inviting for every (or even any) Buffista.

Some people (myself included) will not likely be able to afford premium channels, and this thread will explicitly exclude them

I don't think it's any more exclusionary than threads about shows not everyone likes or watches.

ETA: As ita points out, Movies is the same thing (I don't go so I can afford the crazy megaTV package) and so are comics and books.