Bar maid! Bring me stronger ale! And some plump, succulent babies to eat!

Olaf the Troll ,'Showtime'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


NoiseDesign - Aug 19, 2005 8:16:41 pm PDT #5834 of 10289
Our wings are not tired

I like more threads. I can home in on certain ones and actually stand a chance of keeping on on them.


libkitty - Aug 19, 2005 9:15:10 pm PDT #5835 of 10289
Embrace the idea that we are the leaders we've been looking for. Grace Lee Boggs

I'm sort of with Gris, except I wouldn't want to a) find a Marsistas board, nor b) start from scratch with new people. I want to talk with the people here about stuff, including VM. But, where I agree is that I don't want to ruin anyone's garden. Besides, I have a hard enough time keeping up with the threads I already follow, so I really don't need another, even if it sounds fun. Because of these conflicted feelings, I will probably also abstain. I'm just totally kicking myself about my Lost vote last fall. I should have cast it for VM. 20/20 hindsight.


Sean K - Aug 19, 2005 10:01:02 pm PDT #5836 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

Won't be the first time I've voted in the minority.

I actually think the minority on this vote will be surprisingly large. I'm against a VM thread, and will vote so. Don't really care about the show, don't watch it, and continued comparisons and correlations between VM and Buffy don't seem to sway me much. Don't quite know what the hubbub is all about.


Eddie - Aug 19, 2005 11:15:59 pm PDT #5837 of 10289
Your tag here.

It seems to me the fundamental question is: What is the criteria for a separate thread to be created rather than have a show share Boxed Set?

Clearly at some point in the past this criteria was met for Buffy, Angel and Firefly. Is the criteria "spawned by Joss" or "the volume of posts [and how is this quantified?] regarding one particular show is drowning out all other discussion and thus needs its own thread"?

"To VM or not VM" is just a symptom of the problem. If this criteria can be determined, then the vote in question is academic.


Lyra Jane - Aug 20, 2005 4:22:30 am PDT #5838 of 10289
Up with the sun

Eddie, I don't usually do this, but you might want to read the FAQ for some board history. We started as one Buffy thread on the Table Talk boards back in ... what, 1997? And grew from there.

I'm going to vote for the thread, even though I'm still somewhat neutral on the show itself. Ideologically, I'm pro-proliferation (deadhorse deadhorse deadhose). In practical terms, I don't like the idea of having to wait until late February to discuss this again or create a thread, as we would have to should the vote fail. In my ideal world, I would want to wait on the vote until after the season premiere just in case the show sucks this season, but I didn't make the proposal.


Jessica - Aug 20, 2005 6:21:49 am PDT #5839 of 10289
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

I'm perfectly happy to register my discontent via the voting system (which I registered discontent about). Won't be the first time I've voted in the minority.

Me too.

At some point, I just grew tired of the sound of my own voice on this matter. I dislike thread proliferation. I will vote as such. If anyone newish to the board is interested in the longer version, feel free to search this thread (and B'craxxy 1) for the word "proliferation."


Sean K - Aug 20, 2005 6:27:20 am PDT #5840 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

I'm actually not anti-proliferation, but I have come to feel that new threads, even when warranted, should be few and far between. Frankly, it seems that almost all the new thread suggestions (with one or two possible exceptions) are OOH, SHINY NEW SHOW!

I think a lot of those are going to fall by the wayside, and I say that as one who has succumbed to that very instinct.

In fact, I think I have a proposal to make in B'cracy.


Eddie - Aug 20, 2005 8:10:51 am PDT #5841 of 10289
Your tag here.

Eddie, I don't usually do this, but you might want to read the FAQ for some board history. We started as one Buffy thread on the Table Talk boards back in ... what, 1997? And grew from there.

Yes, I read all suggested material when I decided I wanted to be a part of this community; I am aware of the published history. Granted, the Buffy thread in my example may not have been the most pertinent, but the creation of the Angel and Firefly threads support my point. Which is that someone at sometime decided that those two shows deserved their own thread based on some sort of justification (which I suspect was simply "Joss created it"). If that justification can be quantified, then we have a long term solution.

I see that Sean K understands where I'm coming from Sean K "Bureaucracy 3: Oh, so now you want to be part of the SOLUTION?" Aug 20, 2005 8:38:11 am PDT

All I'm suggesting is that if we establish a threshold such as what Sean K is proposing we won't have to go through all of this discussion in the future for new shows. If the threshold is achieved, a new thread is created, end of story. Otherwise, the show will have to share Boxed Set.


§ ita § - Aug 20, 2005 8:20:05 am PDT #5842 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Otherwise, the show will have to share Boxed Set.

Why? Why not have whitefonted discussion in Natter or none at all?


Eddie - Aug 20, 2005 8:22:38 am PDT #5843 of 10289
Your tag here.

Why? Why not have whitefonted discussion in Natter or none at all?

That works too. All I was trying to say was "general purpose tv discussion thread".