I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.

Cheese Man ,'Chosen'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


bon bon - Aug 18, 2005 9:32:57 am PDT #5796 of 10289
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

bon, the front page looks like gibberish. Just a bunch of interests thrown at the screen. The information (lack of ) architecture pains me.

I just don't use the front page. I guess there's an argument that architecture will affect how we psychologically compartmentalize the community-- it kinda did in WX-- but message center obviates any organization. I would plead not to compartmentalize message center.

Now that I'm thinking about it-- sorry, hazard of the job-- I can see how it would affect my use of threads I'm NOT subscribed to. Some threads I would probably never click on unless I saw they had new posts when I used the front page. But again, the risk is a bit contingent to raise an issue about it.


§ ita § - Aug 18, 2005 9:33:01 am PDT #5797 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Are you asking about the OT/ness that is my head? Minearverse isn't a show thread to me, so I wasn't thinking of it that way.


Kat - Aug 18, 2005 9:33:14 am PDT #5798 of 10289
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

I've been loving the fact that the closed thread folder has moved threads out of my general daily view somewhere else.

I like the idea of all the TV threads living together in a folder because easier to find, or to ignore... would the angel/buffy threads be there too?


§ ita § - Aug 18, 2005 9:34:16 am PDT #5799 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I would plead not to compartmentalize message center.

Foldering doesn't do that.

Some threads I would probably never click on unless I saw they had new posts when I used the front page.

And some threads I know exist I have to ^F to find on the damned page -- I think it goes both ways.


Laura - Aug 18, 2005 9:38:03 am PDT #5800 of 10289
Our wings are not tired.

I haven't watched VM, yet. The enthusiasm for the show around these parts have put it on my "when I get a chance" viewing list. I favor a place for the VMiacs to discuss the show.

Not sure where I sit on the TV folder thing. I'm happy enough with the way the threads are organized now. I'll listen to the pros and cons on that one.


Betsy HP - Aug 18, 2005 10:12:06 am PDT #5801 of 10289
If I only had a brain...

How is Boxed Set not live and active?

Boxed Set isn't as intense; it isn't all-obsessive all the time. Back in the day, the Buffy thread was still racking up oodles of posts on Friday after a new ep.


§ ita § - Aug 18, 2005 10:49:54 am PDT #5802 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Back in the day, the Buffy thread was still racking up oodles of posts on Friday after a new ep.

Back in the day we were a Buffy board. Right now we're talking about serving slices of the population -- I doubt it could be (even with our greatly increased numbers) be like that again.


Matt the Bruins fan - Aug 18, 2005 10:54:07 am PDT #5803 of 10289
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

I think that boxed set is fairly active but that VM doensn't really fit in the group of shows regularly discussed in Boxed Set. (Smallville, SG1, SGA, Dr. Who and BSG are most commonly discussed there. . .well, Smallville mostly in the past.)

Yeah, for whatever reason when VM posts start up in Boxed Set it seems a much more jarring transition than discussion of other shows I don't watch regularly like BSG. If there are enough people interested in discussing it to make a separate thread worthwhile, I'm all for it.


Wolfram - Aug 18, 2005 11:06:24 am PDT #5804 of 10289
Visilurking

Back in the day we were a Buffy board. Right now we're talking about serving slices of the population -- I doubt it could be (even with our greatly increased numbers) be like that again.

A new (non-animated) Buffyverse show on network television. IJS.


§ ita § - Aug 18, 2005 11:09:05 am PDT #5805 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

A new (non-animated) Buffyverse show on network television. IJS.

Am I supposed to not doubt this will happen?

One show to rule them all,
One show to find them,
One show to bring them all
And in the interwebs bind them

Not only do I doubt the existence of the show, I doubt the unifying power.