You can't open the book of my life and jump in the middle. Like woman, I'm a mystery.

Mal ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


Sean K - Apr 13, 2005 2:25:44 pm PDT #5281 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

Are you proposing a Seantatorship

Boy, there's an idea that would get shot down in flames....

or saying the will of the voters != the best thing for the board?

Yeah, that's more or less the crux of my argument.

If the latter, how would you propose we suss out what's best for the board?

By discussion. Actually, now that it's phrased just that way, I'm not certain the voting thing was ever meant to suss out what's "best for the board," and using it as such is what's striking me as dangerous precedent. I mean, have we ever used in in that particular manner? So far, it's seemed to be about having or not having new threads. In fact, a number of things that could fall under the perview of "best for the board," such as hosting decisions, are specifically excluded from being voted on.


Sean K - Apr 13, 2005 2:27:47 pm PDT #5282 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

Cause a while back we decided we wanted formal structures to make policies and rules and whatnot.

Like I said, I disagree that this was the intent when we created the voting procedures. Have we used it in this manner yet?


Trudy Booth - Apr 13, 2005 2:28:55 pm PDT #5283 of 10289
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart

a sockpuppet hijacking the conversation

Conversations come and go here. They run their course and then end. It's the nature of the beast.


Scrappy - Apr 13, 2005 2:29:06 pm PDT #5284 of 10289
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.

We used it to decide whether/how to ban posters anbd what to ban them for.


DavidS - Apr 13, 2005 2:29:23 pm PDT #5285 of 10289
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I'm not certain the voting thing was ever meant to suss out what's "best for the board," and using it as such is what's striking me as dangerous precedent.

What dangerous precedent? We already established guidelines for disciplinary actions and booting peoples ages ago. We ceased to be a bullshit consensus board when we established the voting procedure.


Wolfram - Apr 13, 2005 2:30:25 pm PDT #5286 of 10289
Visilurking

If Wolfram wants to start a discussion about posters using song lyrics in tag lines and says it bugs him, that's okay--even though I always use song lyrics.

As long as it's not the milkshake song, or getting anything started...

I do appreciate citations on tags.


msbelle - Apr 13, 2005 2:31:37 pm PDT #5287 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

yes. We used it to decided when people would get warned, suspended and banned.

the entire voting system was set up out of discussions with people getting frustrated that the board was so large now and trying to discuss things only as a way of reaching a decision was never-ending and nowhere going.

My personal perspective on it was a few people trying to actually discuss things, several more people posting over and over their same point or the way they would like the decision to go.


Atropa - Apr 13, 2005 2:33:46 pm PDT #5288 of 10289
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

Question for the people who have created and used sockpuppets: did you know that sockpuppets annoyed some people, or is this news to you? I'm just wondering.

Totally news to me. I didn't create Clovis' log-in, but once it *was* created and I had the log-in information, I did use it once or twice. I never suspected that people were bothered by it.


Lyra Jane - Apr 13, 2005 2:34:38 pm PDT #5289 of 10289
Up with the sun

Conversations come and go here. They run their course and then end.

Trudy, do you feel that posting as MARCH is the exact same thing is saying "Hey, what are the good restaurants in West Hollywood?" -- another conversation that will interest some people and that everyone else can scroll by? Because that's what I'm getting from you, and I wonder if you can understand that it does not feel that way to the people who are annoyed by sockpuppets.


Sean K - Apr 13, 2005 2:35:12 pm PDT #5290 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

We used it to decide whether/how to ban posters and what to ban them for.

Thanks, Robin. I wasn't sure. It had seemed all thread creation and the like to me.

What dangerous precedent? We already established guidelines for disciplinary actions and booting peoples ages ago. We ceased to be a bullshit consensus board when we established the voting procedure.

I don't know. Did we have even a significant minority of people speaking out against booting people, or against certain offenses and whether or not they should be bootable?

Knowing us, the answer there is probably a resounding YES.

I just.... the "if the majority of people vote to ban sockpuppets, it should happen," argument it VERY strongly smacking of the type of thinking that's turning the US into Jesusland right now, and I really dislike that this is now creeping into my board.

I don't have a good grasp on my rebuttal, and maybe I'm wrong, and maybe for just those reasons alone I should just shut the hell up and piss off already, but I'm a little mule-headed.