Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Still, better than 32% of the posts in 500 seems significant.
See, someone needs to do some research and find out what percentage demanded the creation of other threads that purportedly overwhelmed Natter. I think I recall someone saying that's how LOTR was created, but I'm not sure about the others like Movies, Music, and Lit, etc.
Adding a half a dozen teevee threads just moves us closer to TWoPness.
I don't think anyone is talking about adding half a dozen threads; it will depend on the poll results, but one or two, possibly three, seems more likey based on the discussion, and even that is far from certain. I can kind of understand that if you don't want new threads at all, one is as bad as ten, but I want to make sure no one thinks six new threads are being seriously proposed.
See, someone needs to do some research and find out what percentage demanded the creation of other threads that purportedly overwhelmed Natter.
Movies and music were created more because they were lost in Natter than the other way around, P-C. Our bandwidth fears were less pronounced, and it was the days before voting, so people who really wanted them were able to lobby and get them started. I'm not sure about LotR, but I think ti was similar.
How many were Nip/Tuck related? Really. If we're going to go by what is talked about all the time, we'd need a, "I think I'm fat and ugly" thread, a "i really like my cat" thread, a "i hate my job" thread, and possibly a "FCM" thread.
Are we stagnating now? What are the signs?
I'm not sure what the signs of stagnation would be or how to quantify that. However, I do know I value the critical discussion that has been generated by Book Club, and that rich, analytical bent has been in shorter supply around the threads.
That's what I meant when I said that it seems like this proposal is really about reshaping the board.
See, but the board changes shape over time anyway. We're just making a conscious choice in this instance about what shape we might want to try. I think it's a mistake to see this as anything other than us adding a new thread for discussing a new show. We have other non-ME shows that we discuss. It doesn't have to be us rewriting the Constitution. We're trying this out.
Lost
in particular seems to have a wide appeal. I'm finding the white font overwhelming such that I have to skip hundreds of posts to get to any Natter discussion. And then when I catch up to the show, it doesn't seem possible to enter the discussion.
I don't threadsuck nor bookmark - that's just not how I use the threads or pariticipate here.
We're just making a conscious choice in this instance about what shape we might want to try.
Which is fine as long as everyone is being honest about it, but I get the feeling that some of us see this as a change and others are less comfortable with calling it that.
It doesn't have to be us rewriting the Constitution.
PS, you know how you hate it when folks use the term "psychosis" to refer to anything other than the DSMR definition? Well, I get nutty when people start using political metaphors to describe friggin' board culture. OF COURSE it's not like rewriting the Constitution because we aren't a government. I think we are all pretty much in agreement on that one, right?
I think threadsucking and bookmarking are workable solutions. Just keep in mind that incorporating those methods will also change board culture.
62 posts out of 500 would be 12.4%, wouldn't it?
Sure. Bring correct arithmetic into the discussion. Commie.
I'll go back to impressions. Scanning the latest Natter made me feel like it was mostly about a
Lost
episode that I missed.
When I finally get that episode, I will want to go back and threadsuck, to get what the cool kids were saying about the episode. This would be easier in a
Lost
thread.
Hey, George Jetson sprained-finger issue to one side.
I think threadsucking and bookmarking are workable solutions. Just keep in mind that incorporating those methods will also change board culture.
Wha? Those methods have always been available.
Which is fine as long as everyone is being honest about it, but I get the feeling that some of us see this as a change and others are less comfortable with calling it that.
Burrell, I swear I'm not being disingenous here -- why is this, in particular, a change?
We've always added new threads, though we put the brakes on when our board resources were taxed.
We've had threads for non-ME shows since "Smallville" premiered, and possibly before. This will be the first at this board, but this is also the first TV season without Buffy or Angel.
The polling is new, but I think it's a way to make the most people the most comfortable with the results. Whatever comes up through the polling will still need to be proposed and voted on; it's very possible we may end this with no new threads at all.
Maybe you still think it Feels Different, which I can't argue with. It feels different to me because it's my first proposal; I can't judge how it would feel to someone on the other side.