It's always so exciting when lightbulbs opens.

I have no opinion on the matter. wheeee!

I would like to see another concentrated Buffista thread that serves the purpose the show threads did: to give us something other than our own lives to obsessively talk about.

Thread proliferation is a problem, and I got no solution. But I would adore it if we picked another arc-y show to obsess over.

I would adore it if we picked another arc-y show to obsess over.

And I would find it kinda scary and borgish (as opposed to b.orgish).

Honestly? I'd love a TV folder with a thread per show. We have neither the capacity nor the code.

Lyra Jane, am I right in thinking that, under your proposal, we would have a separate thread for each show that is considered to be of sufficient interest, and that each thread would be NAFDA for its show?

If so, if we want to discuss one show in comparison to another show (for example, if I am posting in the OC thread, but want to bring up something from JoA that I thought was relevant), what would the whitefont rule be?

I'd suggest we wait until we've determined the One True Angel Quote before we close the Quotables thread. Other than that, shiny.

1. That to reduce server load, Angel Spoilers, Previously, and Angel Quotables be closed and archived as soon as is feasible;

There's no evidence that closing these threads will reduce server load by a measureable amount. If that's the only reason to close them, leave them open.

So, um, I just want to make sure I understand this. The proposal is to create some new threads, the actual topics of which are TBD once we actually discover what shows, if any, generate enough interest to warrant it?

2. That the Buffistas hold a poll to see which, if any, TV shows have sufficient poster interest to deserve a thread. The format of the poll and number/percentage of votes needed to determine "sufficent interest" will be decided through discussion, as will the upper limit on the number of threads we can create.

I think the very first thing that needs to be decided is the part about "upper limit on the number of threads", or in other words, board capacity. In fact, I doubt much use will come out of discussing and selecting deserving TV shows until that issue gets resolved.

If they are closed and archived (a process in which I've been remiss), then not only will their volume magically disappear, but the posts table will be smaller.

I don't know that making the table smaller by 15K records will produce a measurable difference, because I haven't measured. But I had thought so.

we would have a separate thread for each show that is considered to be of sufficient interest, and that each thread would be NAFDA for its show?

That's my idea, though if the discussion turns it into something else, I would accept that.

if we want to discuss one show in comparison to another show (for example, if I am posting in the OC thread, but want to bring up something from JoA that I thought was relevant), what would the whitefont rule be?

What did we do when we had both Angel and Buffy (or Angel, Buffy and Firefly, or Wonderfalls and Angel) running? One-week grace period, right? That could work. (I have no real preference.)

The proposal is to create some new threads, the actual topics of which are TBD once we actually discover what shows, if any, generate enough interest to warrant it?

More or less, yeah. I know it seems kind of backwards, but I would rather we decide how many we can have and create/plan to create all new TV threads at once, rather than having to go through the whole proposal/vote process for "Lost" this week and "The O.C." in November and "JoA" in January, or whatever.

I have one question; if this fails, would it mean we could have no new TV threads for six months? Or just that we couldn't enact them under this process?