But Buffy and Angel threads are exactly what the Book Club thread would be like, it seems to me. Why did we separate Buffy from Angel (from Firefly)? It was so people could really concentrate discussion on each show. The book club would be like the show threads, one hopes, where everyone there is only interested in talking about this one thing, and that concentration leads to some interesting insights. I like the atmosphere in the Lit thread as it is now, with people recommending books and sharing book histories. The all-over-the-placeness of it is part of its charm.

I have to ask though: why this terror at letting it be in its own thread? It's not like we're going to be taking the car on a midnight run to Vegas after stealing the credit cards. We just want to play down and dirty word games.

One, proliferation (and that covers reasons two through 22). Twenty-three, precedent.

What Robin said. There is only one Buffy show. There are millions of books. Literary covers the millions. The book club would cover one.

Proliferation is not always evil. Nor are precedents. Precedents can always be ignored.

I have voted yes to every added thread (movies, literary, music) and then been slightly unhappy with the results as the broadness of the subject does not lend itself to somewhat focused discussion. I think a book club thread may be more of a way to solve the analytic urge cut off at the knees by the end of ALL of our TV shows.

Also I like the way I can skim literary for recs and think that if we put bookclub in their it will lose that ease.

What Robin said. There is only one Buffy show. There are millions of books. Literary covers the millions. The book club would cover one.

Board not called Bookistas, to be blunt.

A book club could handle one book within the confines of an existing thread, probably without doing much, if any, damage to the existing thread, which is slow as treacle when people aren't busy fighting in it.

One, proliferation (and that covers reasons two through 22). Twenty-three, precedent.

And this.

All discussion should take place in one giant thread

t old-timer I remember back on TT, when there was only one thread, and it was a Buffy thread. Really. Buffistas confined themselves to one thread. And then it grew.... t /old-timer

I'm pretty neutral on the Book Club thread, but more like neutral-fine-with-it, rather than neutral-please-not-another-thread.

I don't know if I would participate in it, but it's no big if there's one more existing thread that I don't participate in. I participate in Movies but not LOTR, but LOTR's existence doesn't bother me.

On the other hand, I totally get Plei's comparison to the comics thread, but I think the Book Club thread would be higher posting volume than comics currently is. Right now Comics is a small band of freaks, but if it got way bigger, possibly all the Green Arrow discussion that would burst forth exuberantly would drive me nuts. I don't really know.

If the Book Club participants are many and chatty (hell, we're Buffistas; we are therefore chatty), then I think a separate thread would be fine.

It seems sort of like a show thread and the quotables thread for that show. There's utterly no reason that quotes couldn't have been posted in the show thread. But they managed to get their own threads anyway.

I think a book club thread may be more of a way to solve the analytic urge cut off at the knees by the end of ALL of our TV shows.

All the ME shows. There are still plenty of us watching other shows, which then get whitefont discussion in Natter.

Also I like the way I can skim literary for recs and think that if we put bookclub in their it will lose that ease.

I think there's a false assumption that Bookclub would generate a mass of traffic akin to showday and post episode watch and posts. A slow, but steady, influx of commentary seems the more likely possibility.

Or what Scrappy (I mean Robin) said...

But that is not the percentage I want making decisions for this board, really.

Me, neither. Ya wanna borrow my sledge hammer?