Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
On a slightly related note, after more thought, I do think that the Book Club could be integrated successfully with the existing Literary thread, in the same way that the drabbles work within GWW and the Foamies (used to) work within movies. The more I think about it, the more it feels like a project than a new thread.
Wolfram, please see the above from Jess. I know you want to work out the thread particulars if and when the thread passes. But I'm wondering what you (and/or Heather) had in mind. Are you thinking of a once a period (month, week, whatever) conversation, only after all the participants are all done with a given book, or an ongoing and weekly-to-daily type of conversation, as we progress through the book?
What if we tried it once in the current Lit thread to actually see what kind of havoc it caused? Then we'd have proof to satisfy the anti-proliferationists. Jessica brings up a good point about the drabbles. They've worked fine in-thread.
What about an agreed-on post heading to distinguish Book Club posts from ordinary Lit thread posts. Something to flag non-club members on by while skimming? Likewise, there could be a post heading for Lit-thread posts, so Club members could bypass, if they're only keeping up with Club posts. Maybe color-coded eye-cues? Everyone would have to agree and remember to use them, though.
Actually, I think it's a rather silly idea, and I think the Book Club thread is the simplest way to go. I think a coda to close the thread for lack of activity is overkill, too. Start it, if it doesn't get traffic, close it.
On a slightly related note, after more thought, I do think that the Book Club could be integrated successfully with the existing Literary thread, in the same way that the drabbles work within GWW and the Foamies (used to) work within movies. The more I think about it, the more it feels like a project than a new thread.
I don't know what the drabbles are, and IIRC the Foamies were a once-a-year thing. Which leads me to...
But I'm wondering what you (and/or Heather) had in mind. Are you thinking of a once a period (month, week, whatever) conversation, only after all the participants are all done with a given book, or an ongoing and weekly-to-daily type of conversation, as we progress through the book?
I can't speak for Heather. What I envisioned was a continuing discussion of a specific work which would mean, for the most part, on any given day there would be a book under discussion as well as a book or books assigned for reading for the next discussion. I don't think the Literary folk would appreciate their thread being hijacked just to hammer out the details of book club, much less, to actually hold book club on a regular basis.
I don't know what the drabbles are
Every week, Teppy suggests a theme to be drabbled (one-hundred-word pieces), and we drabble. The drabbles get drabbled, and regular GWW discussion has gone on unimpaired.
I am aware that this is a rather tactless question, and that it will likely raise some heckles. But I want to know the answer, so I'm going to ask it anyway. If there are any flames, they can fall on me.
The Book Club idea was first floated in the midst of a heated kerfuffle in the Literary thread. It seemed, to me, to be a proposal intended to give each side of the kerfuffle its own discussion space.
What I'm still unclear on is, to put it as bluntly as possible, which side goes where? Did people want to move the litcrit to the Book Club thread and leave Literary to the anti-intellectuals, or the other way around?
It seemed, to me, to be a proposal intended to give each side of the kerfuffle its own discussion space.
I didn't see it that way at all. I saw it as a sidebar to the kerfuffle.
I didn't see it that way at all. I saw it as a sidebar to the kerfuffle.
The WGA would give it an "Inspired by" credit.
The Book Club idea was first floated in the midst of a heated kerfuffle in the Literary thread. It seemed, to me, to be a proposal intended to give each side of the kerfuffle its own discussion space.
First of all, the proposal in book club was made by Heather as a way for her to benefit from a discussion of literature. It was never meant to give "each side" it's own thread. As if there were two distinct sides.
Secondly, this proposal is
not
intended to solve the problems recently aired in Literary. It is a proposal based on a lot of interest expressed in Literary from people on different sides of the kerfuffle, and it is geared to the general Buffista public, not just the Literary folk.
What I'm still unclear on is, to put it as bluntly as possible, which side goes where? Did people want to move the litcrit to the Book Club thread and leave Literary to the anti-intellectuals, or the other way around?
The answer is neither.
Fine. I withdraw the question.