Three and six, and what if Sean *likes* being fucked by angry Buffistas?
Saffron: He's my husband. Mal: Well, who in the damn galaxy ain't?
'Trash'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Betsy HP - Mar 20, 2003 7:06:50 pm PST #39 of 10289
If I only had a brain...
kat perez - Mar 20, 2003 7:07:16 pm PST #40 of 10289
"We have trust issues." Mylar
I vote for a choice between 3 and 6 months. A year is just too long, IMO. And I know we're all into the spelling out everything, but I think if something really momentous happened that caused us to want/need to revisit a closed issue, we'd know it. Limiting revisting to Jossverse issues would rule out the scenario someone posited above if Dubya declared the US a dictatorship with him as head dic-tator. I think maybe something vague in the proposal about the possibility of revisiting closed decisions in extreme/extraordinary circumstances should suffice.
amyth - Mar 20, 2003 7:09:51 pm PST #41 of 10289
And none of us deserving the cruelty or the grace -- Leonard Cohen
what if Sean *likes* being fucked by angry Buffistas?
Sounds like a mutually beneficial relationship.
Gandalfe - Mar 20, 2003 7:16:46 pm PST #42 of 10289
The generation that could change the world is still looking for its car keys.
if Sean *likes* being fucked by angry Buffistas?
God knows I would.
Rebecca Lizard - Mar 20, 2003 7:18:45 pm PST #43 of 10289
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket
I'm for six months, I think, although I could be seduced to three.
(And I'm slightly horrified by the sight of Sean doing the Jesus impression, and not because I have any residual Christian sense for the sacrilegious. But, yo... that's just me.)
Michele T. - Mar 20, 2003 7:23:01 pm PST #44 of 10289
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi
Was there a decision on whether something could be anti-seconded?
I'm also for not-a-year.
Michele T. - Mar 20, 2003 7:23:26 pm PST #45 of 10289
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi
I'm also in favor of saying that all pre-voting decisions stand, period.
Java cat - Mar 20, 2003 7:25:31 pm PST #46 of 10289
Not javachik
This wasn't proposed, but what about 3 months and 4 months? One allows the possibility 4x/year and the other 3x/year. 2x/year? Given how much happens here in 6 months, it seems long.
Cindy - Mar 20, 2003 7:42:29 pm PST #47 of 10289
Nobody
kat perez - Mar 20, 2003 7:53:41 pm PST #48 of 10289
"We have trust issues." Mylar
This ballot brought to you by the numbers 2, 3, 6, 5, and the letter v.