Angel: How're you feeling? Faith: Like I did mushrooms and got eaten by a bear.

'A Hole in the World'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


Aims - Apr 01, 2004 1:45:30 pm PST #3504 of 10289
Shit's all sorts of different now.

But I'm a little frightened of the kind of newbies a Politics thread might attract.

I agree and suggest that the thread be called something non-ME related. Would it be possible to NOT have a slug for it, that way it wouldn't show up on a google?

It's a bad idea because it drains interesting discussion out of Natter.

I think there is as much a chance of this happening as the period talk leaving Bitches.


Dana - Apr 01, 2004 1:46:23 pm PST #3505 of 10289
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

And I agree with David and Jess' cons.

I see the potential for this to turn into a hugely argumentative thread which will cause serious disagreements and unhappiness with posters that will inevitably spill over into other threads.


DavidS - Apr 01, 2004 1:46:58 pm PST #3506 of 10289
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I think there is as much a chance of this happening as the period talk leaving Bitches.

A lot of people already think Natter has been seriously diluted by the Movie and music threads. This would remove one more substantial topic of discussion.


Connie Neil - Apr 01, 2004 1:48:22 pm PST #3507 of 10289
brillig

as for draining interesting talk out of Natter, this might give those of us who have no hope of keeping up with Natter a chance to take part in interesting topics. And if it is divisive and flamebaity there, it'll be divisive and flamebaity anywhere. Better to have a concrete bunker for such things than an unsuspecting front parlor.

Seconds on the innocuous name/anonymity thoughts. Those of us who care will find it.


Dana - Apr 01, 2004 1:48:25 pm PST #3508 of 10289
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

And could I use any more adverbs? Surely not.


Aims - Apr 01, 2004 1:48:36 pm PST #3509 of 10289
Shit's all sorts of different now.

This would remove one more substantial topic of discussion.

It would, but it would also get it out of the threads where the discussion really doesn't belong.


Katie M - Apr 01, 2004 1:50:36 pm PST #3510 of 10289
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

It would, but it would also get it out of the threads where the discussion really doesn't belong.

That would require enforcement, though. People will have to be reminded "don't talk about that here! That's why we have a politics thread!"


Aims - Apr 01, 2004 1:51:56 pm PST #3511 of 10289
Shit's all sorts of different now.

People will have to be reminded "don't talk about that here! That's why we have a politics thread!"

True. But I've seen posters who'll be discussing something in one thread and say, "Whups. Let's move it here."


Jessica - Apr 01, 2004 1:52:38 pm PST #3512 of 10289
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

People will have to be reminded "don't talk about that here! That's why we have a politics thread!"

To an extent, this already happens. In the show threads, people will say "take it to Natter" from time to time.

It doesn't often work, but that's another issue.


Kristen - Apr 01, 2004 1:52:44 pm PST #3513 of 10289

Can we reference The Cutting Edge into the thread title?

So every time another thread drifts, we can just say, "Toepick."