What would help at this point is getting some kind of count or voice on which is preferred, 3 months or 4.
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
I know we feel the need to decide immediately. But, in a world of 4 days mandatory discussion time plus three days of voting, what's another 3 days?
Why the fear of the runoff?
What would help at this point is getting some kind of count or voice on which is preferred, 3 months or 4.
I want 4. FTR.
Three.
Very much so.
Just so my earlier three looks like I meant it.
Three. (As opposed to four.)
Which is not in any way related to my earlier six vote, because I never expressed a preference between the two.
Voting complexities make baby Jesus cry.
And make Dawn scream, "GETOUTGETOUTGETOUT!!!"
I prefer four.
Three. It's so nice and even - we can revisit a decision quarterly.
Can discussing voting ever be off-topic in a thread called "Voting Discussion"? I think yes.
Actually doing a runoff will take less time than trying to convince everyone to do an instant runoff. We have ample evidence of that.
Go fourth and sin no more.
When you say "fourth" do you mean 4, or 1/4 of a year?