Can we make it optional? I mean, sometimes it'll be needed, but not every single time, right? And we just decided it would be nice, right -- it wasn't voted in or anything, right?
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
I think I left it as a suggestion. I do think it is needed for this one.
Yes, yes, yes, and yes.
t edit to Jesse.
Jon just can't say No to Jesse.
Hee!
Really, I just want it clear that if no one can be bothered to come up with a statement of pros and cons, that the ballot can still move forward.
I've decided to go ahead with the vote, using my original proposal as written, so whenever you have the time, Jon, let me know.
I'll try to do it tonight, but if not, definitely by noon tomorrow.
Who's counting ballots? ita needs to point votes@... to the counter-person.
if no one else is willing, I will again. I have a system down now.
I will count.
thank you msbelle. my husband thanks you, my children thank you, my cats thank you.