Java, absolutely not. It's when threadsucking is used for evil, that I wish, like others, there was a happy medium. Like "Are you going to use this board for evil? Check yes or no." on the registration. Not that would help....but....

(and yeah, what amych said...get thee to Bitches!!)

Like "Are you going to use this board for evil? Check yes or no." on the registration.

Followup "Do you mean cool evil (the kind with leather pants) or merely annoying evil (the kind with big hair and multiple personalities)?"

that was pretty conclusively shouted down last time it was discussed.

I thought what was shouted down was a "complain to the stompies and get a ban" procedure that left out any public discussion or attempts to resolve things on-board. However, I could be misremembering.

I'm speaking only for myself here, but I can't really see the problem with someone writing to the stompies to say, "I don't feel safe bringing this up, but..." at which point, assuming that there have been attempts to resolve things in-thread, we could post in bureau on that person's behalf to get things rolling officially.

Java, what amy said, which I'm saying a lot today. The proposal is not about problems with posters, it's about people who haven't registered at all.

Again, I did not propose that any specific threads be locked. The proposal is whether or not we should even have the ability to do it. I probably shouldn't have mentioned examples of threads that one might propose be locked. Even if we have the ability, we would still have to propose, discuss, and vote to lock a thread.

I can't really see the problem with someone writing to the stompies to say, "I don't feel safe bringing this up, but..." at which point, assuming that there have been attempts to resolve things in-thread, we could post in bureau on that person's behalf to get things rolling officially.

From what I remember, there was a feeling that the problem with that was that the poster who was being discussed should know who they had offended.

Rather than locking an existing thread, what if we established a new reporting procedure? Cindy said:

I think we either need some sort of private thread to discuss our suspensions and bannings, or some other method.

What about an email account off-site?

I just want to mention that Bitches is not really all full of the secrets that non-Bitches think it is

I don't know, the things I've learned about people moisturizing habits has been rather shocking.

But seriously, I'll be voting no. Anything to avoid the air of exclusivity. And if paying for access were ever proposed, even if I were to be grandfathered in, I'd be gone.

What about an email account off-site?

That really only applies to Cindy's situation. My concern is more with discussing things like what our response is to be when our hosting service screws us over, or we have to devise a response to two lurkers who are threatening the community.