On the lighter side, I realized that tonight will be the first broadcast of the rebooted Murphy Brown ... unless, of course, it gets pre-empted for some "breaking news" (sarcasm font).
Jayne ,'Jaynestown'
Natter 76: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Foaminess
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, butt kicking, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Oh, I forgot to post my picture from Universal of the "Now filming" board with The Good Place on it! *Runs over to Facebook*
I AM vexed. That's a good one.
Kind of excited to see what Murphy Brown does with the current shirtstorm.
Connie, in my experience (which is not extensive) TKEs are like a less intense version of DKEs. DKEs are the worst. (disclaimer: my college did not have fraternities, my opinions are based on going to high school near LSU which sometimes seemed to be entirely frats)
TKEs are like a less intense version of DKEs.
Euw.
Timelies all!
Hey, new thread! Double digit post!
So I've been thinking about it, and I kind of want to see myself as an aaaaahhhhtist, and I want to tell her that I'll sell her signed prints that I made (or supervised) myself, but I won't let her make her own prints. (This will in all likelihood kill the deal). Does this sound silly and/or pretentious, though?
It sounds like you're wanting to maintain control of your image. So they want to purchase all the publication rights to the image, not just a copy?
I mean, you aren't trying to make a living with your art, Tom, so I say you can do what you want! Like Erykah Badu said, "I'm an artist and I'm sensitive about my shit."
That sounds reasonable. If nothing else, controlling the quality of the print so your reputation doesn't suffer if they screw it up somehow sounds like a perfectly cromulent concern to me.
Also, nothing wrong with being a pretentious and or silly ahhhtist!