So I've been thinking about it, and I kind of want to see myself as an aaaaahhhhtist, and I want to tell her that I'll sell her signed prints that I made (or supervised) myself, but I won't let her make her own prints. (This will in all likelihood kill the deal). Does this sound silly and/or pretentious, though?
'Shells'
Natter 76: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Foaminess
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, butt kicking, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
It sounds like you're wanting to maintain control of your image. So they want to purchase all the publication rights to the image, not just a copy?
I mean, you aren't trying to make a living with your art, Tom, so I say you can do what you want! Like Erykah Badu said, "I'm an artist and I'm sensitive about my shit."
That sounds reasonable. If nothing else, controlling the quality of the print so your reputation doesn't suffer if they screw it up somehow sounds like a perfectly cromulent concern to me.
Also, nothing wrong with being a pretentious and or silly ahhhtist!
I just had to use my nebulizer for the first time this year, so I guess it's officially fall now.
It's your stuff, Tom. You do what you want.
And I didn't want this in the same post, but I really actually want something bad to happen to Lindsey Graham at this point. I am past feeling guilty about it.
If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed.......and we will deserve it. — Lindey Graham
That closeted shitstain deserves to get destroyed.
I saw a line on Twitter today: I'm out of spoons, all I have are knives.
In other news, I learned today about the existence of a maple Old Fashioned, and I think I need one of those tonight.
They're going to confirm this fucker, despite the fact that he lied constantly, didn't answer their questions, and was fucking disrespectful to multiple senators (and the fact that he was testifying in front of the Senate).
What a fucking nightmare.