Good luck, sj! That's a lot in one day.
Feel better, Sparky! That sounds terrible.
I really have to get my shit together. I'm not very busy, but there is definitely stuff I could/should be doing. Instead I am just dicking around. I am just in the doldrums and should probably take some time off so I'm not faking it, but I was just on vacation!
Ding ding ding! And if your reviewers never review stuff, then you can't ever close your issues!
And yet it's still your fault that the things are open, don't forget!
You guys, there is someone in a junior position here whose name is 100% the roller derby name of someone else in a senior position: The senior person is (not actually, but e.g.) Buffy Claymore, and the junior person is Buffy Slaymore!!
Ooooh, that's awesome Jesse!
Communications class is fine, I guess. We are getting lunch, so that's something.
My experience with Agile is that it sounds like it would be great if it worked. And maybe it does work for devs. We writers aren't loving it.
Agile is hell for the documentation side of any org. HELL. I have come around to the heretical stance that waterfall is actually better than agile, because it doesn't have a million meetings to distract people, and there are usually built-in NO REALLY YOU ALL WILL REVIEW THE DOCUMENTS AND GIVE FEEDBACK parts of the schedule.
I also miss specs and spec review, because that process was far more helpful to writers and editors.
We at least don't have to do daily stand-ups because all our devs are in France. But then that means that all of the reviews and planning meetings are early morning.
Waterfall also had UI review built in. And specs to start a terminology list with.
Timelies all!
I have no idea what Agile is, other than a big pain in the ass for many people. Ah, well....