I could argue a good case for intervention in Syria, but under this nightmare I cannot imagine there will be any nuance or good outcome.
Xander ,'Same Time, Same Place'
Natter 75: More Than a Million Natters Served
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, butt kicking, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Oy!!! I've been heads down with work and then was at the gym. My only internet had pretty much been here. Now I'm afraid to look further afield.
I dunno, striking a military target after Assad performed a chemical attack doesn't seem all that extreme. If Russia was informed, I imagine that the airfield was notified and there probably weren't many causalities, if any. Using cruise missiles minimizes risk to U.S. personnel and removes the chance of an air-to-air altercation with Russian aircraft. This feels like Trump wanted to do something and the military prepared a low-risk option. Not that I'm not concerned about what happens next.
This feels like Trump saw a convenient distraction from the Russian connection investigation. If he cared about Syrians, we'd be taking in refugees.
Why would Trump care about Syrians? Looking tough, now there is something he'd care about.
I was about to edit. The civilians such as those who were the victims of the chemical attack.
What a great video, Aims! Thank you for sharing it with us.
Oh, Aims, those beautiful children make me so happy, I'm weeping.
Thank you Aims, that's exactly what was needed this morning
Oh Aims! That was a complete delight!
As for the Syrian bombing. I this instance he has apparently listened to the military people's suggestions. It is probably what needed to be done, really only a small fraction of what should be done. However, doing one thing that has bipartisan support and probably needed to be done does not come close to balancing the scales with the massive quantities of completely horrific things he has done and is doing.