But apparently not as passionate as this author.
Tara ,'Get It Done'
Natter 75: More Than a Million Natters Served
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, butt kicking, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
It is my fond hope that you be permitted to send the author this in response: [link]
She presumably typed that with a straight face.
I assume they wait for each issue of the journal with bated breath, praying it will bring another installment of their favorite author's work.
Wow, pie flashback.
When come back, bring pie chart.
I hope it's this pie chart.
I might fight the senior editors to get that one left in.
Bahahahaha, the author emailed me and said "I have written to the editor-in-chief to request a waiver of a misguided rule. I know that you were only following orders, but omitting this figure hinders research."
Again, this is a PIE CHART. I mean, complex figures do exist (and we hatessss them, yes we do), and I could understand her outrage if we axed a really complex figure. But this figure is the equivalent of "Dogs: 43%; Cats: 43%; Lizards: 10%; Mothras: 3%; That Thing From The Neverending Story: 1%." WHAT THE SHIT LADY.
This is not a good day to fuck with me.
"Dogs: 43%; Cats: 43%; Lizards: 10%; Mothras: 3%; That Thing From The Neverending Story: 1%."
...can I read this study, though?
I know that you were only following orders, but omitting this figure hinders research.
Why do you hate scientific progress, Steph? I mean, obviously a peon such as you can only follow orders without any kind of independent thought, but that pie chart could save the world. YOU DON'T KNOW.