Anyone of note? Hiddleston, maybe?
No one they made a point of showing.
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Anyone of note? Hiddleston, maybe?
No one they made a point of showing.
Of course Hiddleston's in it. It fulfills the "Hiddleston or Cumberbatch" clause that movies have apparently adopted.
>Of course Hiddleston's in it. It fulfills the "Hiddleston or Cumberbatch" clause that movies have apparently adopted.
Which I fully endorse.
You know, I respect BC's acting skills, and I admire him personally. But for the last little bit, his name in a cast sort of assures I won't be seeing whatever it is. It's like Michael Caine or John Wayne, ubiquity doesn't necessarily serve every story.
I've never sen Michael Caine as an indicator that I shouldn't see a movie the way Nicholas Cage and Kristen Stewart are, he just doesn't guarantee that anything other than his own acting will be worth watching.
Bandicoot Cumbermuffin was better than I expected in Dr. Strange, though that American accent made me wince in a couple places.
I maintain the position that Dirty Rotten Scoundrels is Michael Caine's finest movie, bar none.
The Man Who Would Be King. Also, Connery's best performance.
Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
Glorious movie.
I think Cumberboot is in "I have maybe 5 years where I'll be a hot ticket, so I better make my fortune now" mode. Maybe ten years.
Well, of COURSE he is. Who else? Anyone of note? Hiddleston, maybe?
Yes, Hiddleston is in it and Brie Larson.