I can handle the Oz Full Monty. I mean, not 'handle' handle.

Xander ,'Help'


Natter 74: Ready or Not  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, butt kicking, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Gudanov - Jul 29, 2016 4:56:15 am PDT #25233 of 30003
Coding and Sleeping

It's been a really crappy week. I don't wanna work, I just want to tweet lines from Hamilton all day.


askye - Jul 29, 2016 4:57:10 am PDT #25234 of 30003
Thrive to spite them

Trump has the disadvantage of debating a woman.

He's such a mysognist and I have to assume it's got to eat at him some that he has to go up against a woman. Either that or he'll be even more over confident.

But what little I saw of him at the DNC he managed to stay on point for 2 sentences before rambling or at least not able to stay modulated. There's a difference in how he raises his voice and what politicians do.

You never know what will happen.


Laura - Jul 29, 2016 5:48:20 am PDT #25235 of 30003
Our wings are not tired.

I have little hope that the debate moderators can either keep him on point or establish any control whatsoever over the proceedings. Also, I agree Gud, I would love to know who gets to try and play that opponent for Hillary.


Connie Neil - Jul 29, 2016 5:50:01 am PDT #25236 of 30003
brillig

I have little hope that the debate moderators can either keep him on point or establish any control whatsoever over the proceedings.

Dear god, if they get Megyn Kelly . . .

Jon Stewart or Steven Colbert for debate moderator. I think Trump would actually walk off the stage if that were the case.


Sophia Brooks - Jul 29, 2016 5:54:03 am PDT #25237 of 30003
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

Yeah, but he's proven in interviews that he gets angry and blustery when he can't answer a question, so all it will take is a little pushback from Clinton -- or even a moderator -- and he's likely to blow his top.

I am sort of afraid that this is what makes people LIKE him. If you think that Hillary Clinton is a criminal and the actual devil, then someone having all that "righteous" anger could be a good thing in your books. I think that Trump is unlikely to convince people who do not already support him to vote for him, however, so really his sope is that the Hillary hatred is strong enough to move people from her to third party voters.


Connie Neil - Jul 29, 2016 6:31:08 am PDT #25238 of 30003
brillig

I don't think we have a prayer of shifting the people who want to vote for him. I'm after the undecided who have some vague idea that there's no real difference between the two of them and those who don't pay attention to a presidential campaign until October and who are thinking in terms of "Hey, wasn't he on TV? He was funny."


Sparky1 - Jul 29, 2016 6:46:27 am PDT #25239 of 30003
Librarian Warlord

I feel like I just did a very brave thing and filled out the survey on my Dean's performance for the Provost (who will know the comments came from me and who will have my re-appointment for approval on his desk this year).

I can't even imagine a debate, because this whole election is unbelieveable.


askye - Jul 29, 2016 7:08:36 am PDT #25240 of 30003
Thrive to spite them

I don't think there's any hope for people who think Hillary should be in jail for whatever reason they have (emails, benghazi, she and bill murder their enemies, etc)

Mom doesn't like Hillary and doesn't thinik she's trustworthy and I do't htink there's a way to change that but Mom's voting for Hillary. Well she's voting Democrat because she can't stand what the GOP has turned into.

So I just have to hope that the on the fence people will get turned off by Trump.


Toddson - Jul 29, 2016 7:20:26 am PDT #25241 of 30003
Friends don't let friends read "Atlas Shrugged"

And there's three months for him to get even more offensive!

Someone commented that, during Hillary's acceptance speech, some poor Trump aide was probably hiding in a bathroom with T's phone to keep him from tweeting. Lotsa luck.


Steph L. - Jul 29, 2016 7:26:52 am PDT #25242 of 30003
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

An acquaintance who I barely know (I've spent time in a large social gathering with her MAYBE 3 times) sent me a Facebook message at 7 a.m. today that said "Why should I vote for Hillary Clinton? You seem to be following politics, so what are the reasons I should vote for her?"

So. I think perhaps this individual is just bad at boundaries and communication and is just blunt, rather than being combative (which is how I took it at first, especially since she messaged at 7 goddamn in the morning).

And I know I should jump in so I can get one more vote for my girl, but, you know, I just don't have the spoons to respond to a demand for information from someone I barely barely know who thinks it's okay to blow up my phone at 7 a.m. with a non-emergency.

Is that wrong? I just can't cope with anything today, but even if I could, I suspect I'd find this acquaintance's demand for information at 7 a.m. to be very off-putting. I mean, Clinton has a website. Nonpartisan websites exist. Why demand information from someone you barely fucking know? (Though I suspect this is a case where she thinks we're great pals, when literally all I know about her is her name, the name of her current partner, and the name of her ex.)

Or am I being a huge jerk here?