Overwhelming? How much more than whelming would that be exactly?

Anya ,'Touched'


Supernatural 3: Family don't end with blood

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


SuziQ - Jan 05, 2015 12:37:09 pm PST #27 of 808
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame

Benny bugged me less upon rewatch - though I can't explain why. Maybe because I hated whats-her-name (the vet that Sam shacked up with) more?


msbelle - Jan 05, 2015 12:56:25 pm PST #28 of 808
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

And when demons are killed? The go to purgatory or just disappear forever? Angels?


§ ita § - Jan 05, 2015 1:05:11 pm PST #29 of 808
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

We are to assume, I think, that being killed with the colt or anything that does that flashy effect means you're terminated forever. And, concomitantly, that *killing* a demon or an angel ends them utterly.

Amelia--utter despisation, or whatever that noun is. She had no upside, and the actress's voice didn't help matters any.

Can anyone give me some good Sam or Jared tumblrs that don't hate on Misha-Cas or Jensen-Dean? I really don't have enough of him on my dash.


-t - Jan 05, 2015 1:15:48 pm PST #30 of 808
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

I vastly preferred Gabriel as a Trickster to being an Archangel. Have not gotten over how much I dislike the portrayal of Metatron (it's so wrong that he was taking dictation!SO WRONG!)


§ ita § - Jan 05, 2015 1:57:21 pm PST #31 of 808
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'm not sure how I'm supposed to get past Mystery Spot, in all honesty.

How do you think Metatron was supposed to be portrayed?


-t - Jan 05, 2015 2:04:50 pm PST #32 of 808
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

As the Voice of God, not a scribe, basically. It just sticks in my craw.


§ ita § - Jan 05, 2015 2:48:50 pm PST #33 of 808
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

So your stance is that he spoke for God, not repeated/transcribed what God said?

I can't see Show going to full fledged Word of God while the Chuck question is unanswered officially.


-t - Jan 05, 2015 4:14:11 pm PST #34 of 808
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

Repeated is fine, it's the writing down I object to.

Possibly pretty far from rational, but I can't always choose where I draw my lines.

Chuck, for example. I will never accept Chuck being God.


§ ita § - Jan 05, 2015 4:32:34 pm PST #35 of 808
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Chuck, for example. I will never accept Chuck being God.

Kripke has said so in interview, but it doesn't count if it's not explicit onscreen.

I'd be surprised if they went there solidly before the end of the series.


-t - Jan 05, 2015 4:46:22 pm PST #36 of 808
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

Yeah, I know he said so, but it offends my sense of How Things Should Be too much. Even if it clearly becomes canon I cannot get on board with that.