I'm a vision of hotliness, and how weird is that? Mystical comas. You know, if you can stand the horror of a higher power hijacking your mind and body so that it can give birth to itself, I really recommend 'em.

Cordelia ,'You're Welcome'


Supernatural 3: Family don't end with blood

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


Amy - May 16, 2015 11:44:52 am PDT #232 of 807
Because books.

But those of us who've been patiently loyal, hoping for a return to storylines that were more than violence for its own sake, beer drinking and soft manporn, are doomed to be disappointed. There's no art there. There's no deeper meaning. It might scare away the target demo.

For me, with the original creator and writing team pretty much gone, I don't expect the stories to be the same as they once were. The idea itself has also morphed over time, and taken on its own life, due to both the actors and the fans -- and scaring away the target demographic is an actual issue, because this is a product, first and foremost, *not* pure art.

I also don't think it's constructive to consider yourself loyal, or patient. George R.R. Martin is a great example. He knows people are waiting for his books, but it doesn't make them easier or faster to write, and he's certainly not writing anything but the story he envisions. I think fans have to take their "reward" up front -- if you like the show, you watch it and enjoy it.

If you love old-school McDonald's fries, made with lard and sugar, in other words, you can keep buying the newer, healthier variety, but all that means is that McDonald's will keep making them -- not that they'll go back to the old recipe. You would have to stop buying the new fries (actually, lots and lots of people would have to stop) to convince them that customers really want the old version.

Art and commerce are always going to have an uneasy relationship, I think. And when it comes to CW shows, commerce is their only reason for being. If art shows up, that's great, it can grab a beer and a burger, but no one at the network is expecting it to come, or will put save a special seat for it.

Edited for bad grammar. Oops.


-t - May 16, 2015 12:01:31 pm PDT #233 of 807
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

Well now I want beer and a burger and old school fries.

I don't think I liked anything about this episode. But I have liked other episodes this season so I'm not despairing of the show ever being my cup of tea again. Especially disappointed that Castiel didn't fight back. Badass Cas vs Mark of Cain Dean should be worth watching.


Beverly - May 16, 2015 3:13:35 pm PDT #234 of 807
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.

Thanks, Amy. I miss this kind of discussion. I miss show having enough substance to warrant this kind of discussion.

And yes, -t, when Cas with borrowed grace was able to take out demon Dean, then it seems a bit wrong when Cas' own grace wasn't stronger against MOC Dean. That confrontation would have been interesting to watch.

I don't know whether anyone here follows the Js offscreen, but Jared bailed on the Rome and the Australian con, pleading exhaustion. If you've been aware of his and Jensen's Always Keep Fighting fundraiser and awareness campaign, it's coming back to Jared manyfold. I'm a little unsettled by such openness, but if it helps people reach out when they need help, then that's a good thing.


Matt the Bruins fan - May 16, 2015 5:37:12 pm PDT #235 of 807
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

and scaring away the target demographic is an actual issue, because this is a product, first and foremost, *not* pure art.

The thing is, I don't think today's young male target audience would be scared away by one-sided slashy subtext between Cas and Dean, let alone the two occasionally having scenes showing camaraderie and philia. The latter certainly isn't keeping that demographic from paying to see Dom Toretto and Brian O'Connor in the Fast & Furious movies by the tens of millions. The pressure to scrub that Season 6-8 dynamic out of the show is coming from someone else's reservations—whether those belong to Carver, Singer, CW Network execs, or Jensen himself I don't know.


Amy - May 17, 2015 5:29:51 am PDT #236 of 807
Because books.

I was a little startled to see Jared's tweets, too, Bev. I hope he's okay.

The pressure to scrub that Season 6-8 dynamic out of the show is coming from someone else's reservations—whether those belong to Carver, Singer, CW Network execs, or Jensen himself I don't know.

But that's also valid. They don't have to make the product you want. And on top of that, whatever subtext exists between Cas and Dean is only part of it -- the show is different on almost every level than it was in the first five seasons, at least for me, in look, feel, scripts, all of it.


Matt the Bruins fan - May 17, 2015 6:05:23 am PDT #237 of 807
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

But that's also valid. They don't have to make the product you want.

I still have the right to complain about the changes they've made that aren't to my liking, and point out that "what would the children think?" is a fallacious excuse rather than a valid rationale for the change. I'm very much a proponent of the if-it-ain't-broke-don't-fix-it philosophy, and given that ratings actually improved in the wake of Season 8, it's clear that featuring Dean and Cas' relationship as important didn't drive male 18-25 viewers away in droves.


Matt the Bruins fan - May 17, 2015 6:05:23 am PDT #238 of 807
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

Amy - May 17, 2015 6:14:19 am PDT #239 of 807
Because books.

I think I'm coming from a different point of view, though -- I don't see a lot less of the subtext between them now than I ever did, so that's not primarily what I'm thinking of when I say the show has changed.

Also, who's saying "what would the children think?" I'm asking honestly. Is that a reason being given?


Beverly - May 17, 2015 7:56:01 am PDT #240 of 807
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.

I still think it goes back to the network execs, primarily Pedowitz, who is reported to be a big fan of the show. From what I've read, he's a force behind the "straight, male, action" direction of the show, and also behind the rationale that *never resolving an issue* is the type of "conflict" that keeps 18-34 year old guys tuning in. Whether or not the target demographic would accept or respond positively to m/m awareness of any degree is, at this point, moot, because the network says so.

While the creator was at the wheel, the show had to fight each year for whatever creative freedom it was able to win from Dawn Ostroff, and everybody held their breath each season to find out if the show had been renewed. I know fans struggled with some of the storylines in the first four or five seasons. But at least there was some resolution to the storylines the show moved through, there was an adherence to established canon, and there was a throughline, an arc for the series as a whole.

I find it ironic, now when the writers seem to be pulling old scripts out of the closet and shaking out a few of the wrinkles before wearing them, in no particular sense-making order, the network is saying they'll be renewed as long as the cast wants to keep going.


Amy - May 17, 2015 8:05:49 am PDT #241 of 807
Because books.

That sort of makes sense to me, though, Bev. I can't imagine wanting to write about the same two people for ten years plus. And trying to a) keep it fresh and b) adhere to established canon. No matter what writers might want to do, restrictions in terms of budget and actor availability are always going to play into the story arcs. And when you're writing something serially -- i.e. posting episodes before the whole season is written -- you're bound to write yourself into a corner now and then.

I can't imagine working that way, because I've gone back to change things in the earliest chapters of a book after I've finished a rough draft. On TV, though, when that ship sails, it's gone.

I don't want to come across as a complete apologist, either -- I think what I decided was that my feelings for the original canon and the first five seasons are a separate thing from my fondness for the show and the cast now. Now, it's about loyalty and pretty faces and probably a certain stubbornness -- I'm definitely a completist when I can be. But the show I LOVED with my whole heart is not coming back, so I'm not going to spend a lot of time on wishing it would, because it gets me nowhere, and makes me angry and bitter on top of it.