WRITE THE PEER REVIEW - THEN BOOZE!
Kaylee ,'Out Of Gas'
Natter 72: We Were Unprepared for This
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I also have a new work tablet to play with, but I don't get to until I write this peer review. Booze & toys! And am I writing that peer review?
WRITE IT!
Peer review, maximized for corporate buzzword bingo:
Person X has been a key stakeholder in project blah. They are a clear communicator, and always strive to create strong cross-team alliances. Person X is a team player, and will lean in when there are shifts in project priorities or direction.
Person X has a high tolerance for ambiguity.
Yeah, if OTW even just could get like, downloads of the TWoP boards that would be amazing, though I'm sure it's a HUUUUGE amount of data.
I vote Brenda throws someone under a real bus. Possibly in Argentina. Or Reno.
Reno's more about shooting, no?
Okay, in 3 minutes I will stop everything else I'm doing and write the damn thing.
Thanks, Jilli! Totes borrowing some of those.
Ooooh, lean in. I should use that in my self-eval.
I am so sad about TWOP. All the forums being lost seems horrific to me, even though the tone there wasn't always what I wanted. I really don't know another site to discuss tv, except there and here.
When I worked at JCPenney as a sales associate, the rule was that a manager could not give out an evaluation that was high than they themselves recieved, and 75% of their rating was based on department sales. What made it more difficult is this is when local stores were transitioning from having Merchandisers as managers, so that each department had someone chosing what to sell, how to display it, etc to everything coming from corporate, so it also seemed a little unfair that the managers were rated that way when we would recieve 5000 bathing suits in midwinter in upstate New York.