Grammaticians, do you agree that 'because' has a new part of speech role? Some commenters argue it's still the same old, others argue it's been a preposition long time. I am mostly dizzy.
Natter 72: We Were Unprepared for This
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Link trekking led me to these gorgeous photos: [link]
Oh, the Natl Geo photos are always terrific.
edit: source of many backgrounds.
Oh, the Natl Geo photos are always terrific.
Sadly, that first one is just a photo, so we still don't know what it says.
I just bagged 3 40gal bags of leaves. Brian did 2. Took us an hour. This is the third time the alley's been cleared this fall. Uhg.
Grammaticians, do you agree that 'because' has a new part of speech role? Some commenters argue it's still the same old, others argue it's been a preposition long time. I am mostly dizzy.
Yes. Because reasons.
Grammaticians, do you agree that 'because' has a new part of speech role? Some commenters argue it's still the same old, others argue it's been a preposition long time. I am mostly dizzy.
Yes. Because reasons.
ILU.
I think I don't know what prepositions are. Is there a Schoolhouse Rock about those?
But to answer the question, I think it's still a conjunction with an implied clause. The noun (well, usually a noun) after "because" is just shorthand for a longer clause.
Because grammar.
I actually learned a preposition song in 5th (?) grade, which I would sing for you now if you were here. But it's just a list, not a definition. In over under on across against around, beneath beside between before above for by beyond... etc.