Ginger, are you doing anything other than chemo?
The Mayor ,'End of Days'
Spike's Bitches 48: I Say, We Go Out There, and Kick a Little Demon Ass.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Bye, Felicia(I can't believe I named somebody's tumor, but I guess I did.)
You are welcome in my class anytime, Epic!
OK I normally dislike Rebecca Schulman's whiny "why didn't I get a tenure job?!?" schtick, but I am so with her on the academic publication racket.
Yay, Ginger! How are you feeling?
Hooray, Ginger!
Yay Ginger!
You are welcome in my class anytime, Epic!
Can you arrange to teach a few classes in the Human Behavior Master's at National in 2015? If so, I'm SO there!
Yay, Ginger! How are you feeling?
Yes, this.
Yay Ginger!
You don't even know -- my brain is going "APA style is HIDEOUS! Why all the periods?!?"
I know, right? It makes no sense! Well, putting the year right at the beginning makes sense, since for science stuff, "How old is this research?" is generally a pretty important question. Putting the year in parentheses, and then putting a period after it, makes no sense. And italicizing volume number but not page number, while separating them with a comma, is stupid.
It looks like a lot of the bibliographical punctuation format comes from library cataloging practice. The publication date would be on its own line and end in a period. Each element gets its own line on the catalog card and gets a period. I can't remember what the cataloging convention is called, and I can't tell whose citation standard is closest.
I didn't get that blogging gig, but it seems like it had little to do with my presentation at least. I might try to write up a Guest Blog(they also get paid) but so far there is not much difference between my hustling very hard and, you know, not really.