Maybe I'll take the picture to my hair guy. I am anxious for a change.
Buffy: Synchronized slaying. Faith: New Olympic category?
'Conversations with Dead People'
Natter 71: Someone is wrong on the Internet
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Stephanie - Jan 23, 2013 1:40:26 pm PST #8747 of 30001
Trust my rage
Lee - Jan 23, 2013 1:59:41 pm PST #8748 of 30001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
I'm pretty sure the answer is bongos. Because, BONGO!
psst, Jesse is channeling Matthew McConaughey
Sophia Brooks - Jan 23, 2013 2:07:02 pm PST #8749 of 30001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
I think baby bongos because they have cuter ears
Jesse - Jan 23, 2013 2:08:55 pm PST #8750 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
psst, Jesse is channeling Matthew McConaughey
That may actually be true.
§ ita § - Jan 23, 2013 2:14:36 pm PST #8751 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
TAKE OFF YER SHIRT.
I had a (real) nerd on IO9 tell me that female fake nerdery was uber-offensive because there's a history of systematic oppression of male nerds by attractive women.
I have asked him what me lying about liking Mass Effect 4 (I know) has to do with his penis.
Still waiting...
Consuela - Jan 23, 2013 2:16:06 pm PST #8752 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
there's a history of systematic oppression of male nerds by attractive women
I see the words, but they make NO SENSE.
flea - Jan 23, 2013 2:20:56 pm PST #8753 of 30001
information libertarian
But it is so obvious: by not dating male nerds, attractive females are SYSTEMATICALLY OPPRESSING THEM!
Jesse - Jan 23, 2013 2:22:54 pm PST #8754 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA stab.
My phone number finally ported! It's very exciting.
§ ita § - Jan 23, 2013 2:25:33 pm PST #8755 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
HISTORY
SYSTEMATIC
Don't you understand? Me saying I'm a fan but not seeing The Hobbit until the second week (trufax cited "fake geek" scenario, movie may vary) is PROBLEMATIC.
That is my answer to "Why is the fake geek female, attractive, slim, and well spoken, and the real geek is male, less conventionally attractive, heavy set, and stutters?" BECAUSE OPPRESSION.
Oh, okay.
Me, I'm holding out for the next wave of issues, which will be when women are real geeks, but fake male geeks that look like Matt Bomer will fake knowledge of the Silmarillion to just use us sexually.
This is the inevitable next step, right? RIGHT.
§ ita § - Jan 23, 2013 2:28:24 pm PST #8756 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I'm going to have to assume that either this [link] is misreported or just plain false.
Because I have to.