Xander ,'Dirty Girls'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I continue to reach the end of my netflix with shows. I only have 3 or 4 more Dr. Who eps. I am watching Psych from the beginning, which I have never seen, but it is not like the other shows with the long storylines and continuity. I think I will pick FNL back when I finish Who. Maybe pick up where I left off with Dexter also.
Still have not been able to watch anymore of AHS, need to do that. I need some creepy.
The problem is that so many people suck donkey balls.
Absolutely. But it used to be so much easier to ignore the ones I didn't know!
Their patron saint is Bianca Lawson, who, apparently, has been playing a teenager 13 years now.
Upside is, these people are putting names and faces to lots of stupid stuff, and if you're bored enough, you can get some of them in trouble.
I like it when the douches self-identify and tell you where to find them.
Julie Benz was playing a high schooler as recent as 2005, which made her...33? Admittedly they go on to age dramatically, but it's not like the characters spend any time at 33--they go from "teen" to "crone" in typical bad makeup fashion.
Stacey Dash is my all time "no, you're fucking with me!" since she's two years older than me, and was flawless as a teen at 32.
I emailed someone a list of names and asked for their phone numbers and email addresses. I was given back their street addresses. My reply was "So phone and email is out of the question?" I mean, that's pretty much the rest of the address record. His reply? "I did not read you [sic] email that closely". So...do I ask again for the info I require, or do I guess he's got the question and thinks he can supply?
My former manager asked for all my timesheets since 5/26 (after admitting she threw away the detailed project time breakdown I gave her without submitting it to anyone, including the PM). Since all of my timesheets are complete up to 6/30, I don't even know what's going on. Moving out of that team has made things really confusing. I'm not getting explanations anymore. just terse requests and yeses and noes.
I would think that would be implied, but the fact that this person couldn't read the original question correctly makes me doubt. The right thing for this person to have done was "I'll get that info to you shortly" or actually include the correct info with their "I am a moron" email.
Maybe follow up with "Okay, could you get me what I need by such and such a time?".
Timelies! I'm back in the land of internet. CJ and I spent the weekend with some friends at their cabin in Wyoming. So far away from civilization, so freaking relaxing.
It was also heartbreaking in that the forest is mostly dead due to beetle kill. The forest service has dropped a bunch of the dead trees, but left them on the ground. It was hard to look in any direction and not see more dead trees than healthy ones.
If I think someone is an idiot, I always reply an extra time and extra clearly.
If I'm referring to "Hueys" in a document, and it's clear from context that they are small military helicopters, should I explain what they are any more than that? [link]
Maybe follow up with "Okay, could you get me what I need by such and such a time?".
I think I'll go with a "thank you, am tenterhooked until your response" sort of a reply that assumes the info is coming.
But why the fuck would he even assume I wanted street addresses? There were only two sentences in the paragraph. What would imply I wanted to MAIL them anything? He is oddly blatant about brushing people off. Or, well, me.
If it's clear in context, I think you're fine, Jesse.
I think I'll go with a "thank you, am tenterhooked until your response" sort of a reply that assumes the info is coming.
Heh.